Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Again. Why him, and not Uranos? I know it's off topic. I'll drop it again. It just seems strange to me. They could have not put any god between Loki and Poseidon, or used a different major god instead. Why put just one minor god in a lineup that doesn't even include all Major gods (Set isn't in there, and neither is Hades)
I know he's only visible for like a couple frames, blink and you miss it, but making that takes at least two hours, so they must have thought something when doing that.
As I said, I drop it again...
And given that Asatru is a recognized religion in Iceland, there might be a debate regarding the Norse...
It would have been cool to get the big 3 in this game.
The Chinese human unit line up is some of the oddest in a while, we are not a cavalry focused civ, and the Cataphract just breaks the game balance wise especially if you are Norse
The Eight Immortals are Chinese hero units in the game, they can be renamed to something else or use the Persian name for Immortals to avoid confusion
i dont see a roman one happening given they often adopted other cultures gods and made connections too there own
if one set in the Americas did happen, i would expect it too be Aztecs/Mayans/inca
First of all, since it is confirmed that the Chinese faction will be completely reworked to give China the expansion it deserves, my feeling is that the second DLC will introduce some continuity as it was for the Atlanteans with the original game, where the campaign was closely linked to the previous one. Japan would be perfect given its geographic proximity and Chinese influence in its history, so I expect the campaign to cover two such close cultures.
The second reason is that in my opinion the release of the two DLCs will be quite close considering that they are already sold as part of a premium version of the game. Probably both the remake of the 4 factions and the two DLCs are being developed together, and having two neighboring factions from the Asian region introduced in the game almost at the same time could be a winning sales strategy in the short term in that region.
The third reason is that I don't expect a culture to be immediately introduced as a second expansion that is too different (see the Aztecs, who lacked cavalry and siege weapons) or too similar (Celts because too similar to the Norse, and the Romans too similar to Greeks and Atlanteans) to any of the existing former factions. I expect that Chinese and Japanese factions will not deviate too much from the original gameplay, while when the time comes, with future expansions the developers will be able to experiment with something innovative by introducing new unique cultures but always in pairs, so that continuity can always be guaranteed. After China and Japan, some obvious choices might be the Romans and Celts, or the Aztecs and Mayans. All cultures that in some way coexisted and influenced each other, giving developers the opportunity to build an epic story around them as was the case for AoM first and then The Titans.
This is just my thought, I will probably be wrong about everything and we will immediately have the Aztecs who are the ones I would most like to see in the game.
"Celts and Romans won't be added, since they're too similar to Greek and Norse respectively"
For one, and for the other "Japanese make sense because of the Chinese"
I cannot tell an old Japanese building from an old Chinese building from looking at it alone. I don't know what distincts japanese classical architecture from Chinese classical architecture. But I can tell Greek and Roman buildings apart. That's probably partially because I am an European with Italian ancestry. I learned that kind of stuff as a teen. For a Chinese or Japanese person, I can imagine that they wouldn't mistake Chinese from Japanese buildings, but couldn't tell apart Roman from Greek ones.
If Romans are too similar to Greeks, and Celts are too similar to Norse, then Japanese are also too similar to Chinese.