Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Titanic sunk.
Joking aside, honestly I'd hope it would be the same. Unless one is superbly confident in their writing (due to feedback, not their own inflated ego), I wouldn't want someone to try challenging a legend like Agatha Christie.
Going off the developer post though, they seem to have gotten the right idea - to fill in blanks (scene jumps and time skips) and other areas that were only vaguely mentioned (the Armstrong case).
So I for one am glad they didn't decide to rewrite the story.
This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. There are NUMEROUS ways that someone could get this game recommended to them that have nothing to do with knowing Christie or the plot of the story at all. The OP is an absolute prig for spoiling the plot of the game utterly for folks who have a passing interest in "detective games" and are now passing because of this.
. . .honestly surprised the moderators and developer even left it up for so long.