Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Most Electric Playground's videos either have me nodding my head or really disagreeing. After playing the game I have mixed feelings on his impressions.
***Note: I recently finished this game today. So patches may have made my experience different***
On one hand I agree that the game lacks defensive options. As he said, it's very obvious that the developers intend you on playing the game a certain way and can be very frustrating getting juggled over and over again. Enemies do relatively lack variety outside of a select few. And at times the game throws way too many enemies than it could handle.
On the other hand I disagree that the game falls during it's second half. I see this often repeated but I don't see that the game had that much of a difficulty spike or unfairness outside of one particular level in in the 5th stage (you know the one). He also says the game begins using gimmicks like darkness and other things. But like...I can't think of anything besides the sniper level (which was fun)? Maybe they were patched out but there was only two encounters in the entire game where you were fighting in darkness.
I agree with his general feelings of his praises and critiques in the game, but disagree in the details.