Clair Obscur: Expedition 33

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33

View Stats:
Ending makes no sense in my opinion [SPOILER(duh)]
I just have to get it out, the ending choice ignored so many plotpoints. You have this epic final run up, and amazing, cinematic last boss, and then when he is beaten, Maelle finally simingly finds balance, where she understands she doesn't want to lose the other characters (who were very much SENTIENT PEOPLE, that she GREW UP WITH), but understands she doesn't want to lose her family either, and so her father finally trusts her, and lets her fix what they all broke.

So the logical next step is to undo the fracture, and revert the canvas to the state it was as Verso left it, allowing it to be his legacy, to be visited from time to time, but also to move on with their lifes to other work, as would be healthy IRL, right?

Wrong, lets throw this out the window and give us a choice:

A) Take a dead person's work, and after vandalising it and torturing its inhabitants, just burn it down and be happy we moved on, because all of these spoiled god-children can't possibly move on with their lives otherwise. All the lives of those who lived inside reduced to just a device for them to feel better.

B) Pervert it into a weird caricature of itself that its author would never want for it, and continue to use it for our own selfish needs

All the beautiful metaphors in this game about creativity, all the moments that painted Verso had of his friends reinforcing him that he is his own person and deserves his own chance at happiness for what was done to him, all the time we spent with other characters that painters TALKED TO LIKE EQUAL PEOPLE, everything out the window. Only way is to destroy Verso's creation and everyone in it.

And what makes it even more annoying is that Maelle clearly understood that for a second, but everything that happened after painted Verso crossed the portal is just detached from the rest. Why can't we have an ending where Maelle keeps her word, fixes the painting, maybe protects it from her mother and lets Verso's spirit go and rest, as his work remains in peace, and then moves on and returns to her family, thanks to the wisdom she gained from her journey.

WE FOUGHT RENOIR FOR A CHANCE TO DO THE RIGHT THING, AND WHEN WE FINALLY EARNED HIS TRUST TO GET THAT CHANCE, NO ENDING WILL LET US ACTUALLY DO IT.
Originally posted by Likan:
While I wouldn't say the endings make no sense, I must admit I agree that the last few minutes of the main narrative are imho by far the weakest part of an otherwise masterfully told story.

Everything else put aside, both endings objectivley choose to depict their protagonist as an ultimately unlikable, selfish individual who becomes consumed by his or her respective demon (grief for Maelle, and existential vague à l'âme for Painted Verso) and in doing so, chooses to deny other sentient and autonomous beings (whether real or Painted) their right to self-determination.

Both endings disturb me in how their lack of nuance contradicts the narrative up until that point. It's especially obvious when I watch back to back the cutscenes at the end of Act II and Act III. Up until the very final moments, the game takes a painstaking care to explore the moral ambiguity and implications of pitting sentient artifical life against its creators. At the end of Act II, both Maelle and Painted Verso seem on the path to acceptance, of her duality for one, of the legitimacy of his existence as a distinct individual for the other.

But no, both endings choose to throw all complexity and nuance for these characters out of a window (or should I say painting) :).

In Verso's conclusion, very obviously intended to be the "good one", we're told that finally "nope, it was indeed all fake ; Painted Verso's tired of living, wants to commit suicide and take everyone with him, but that's okay because the Canvas is just the toy of a mourned son, its inhabitants just soulless shadows. All this boils down to the well-being of the real Dessentre family, dream is over, everybody move on, (real) life must go on". From a narrative standpoint, I find it to serioulsy invalidate all the stakes the story sets up and all of the player's emotional investment up to that point, it totally ignores the moral implications it had so carefully exposed until then, and verges on self-contradiction : if Painted Verso was still so hell-bent on being Gommaged along with the Canvas and everyone in it, why did he participe in Act III by Maelle's side at all, and why did he fight real Renoir instead of actively helping him ?

Maelle's conclusion is a simpler, she-becomes-a-crazy-authoritarian-Daenerys-Targaryen's style kind of wrap-up (with the same contrived brutality as in the well-known TV show). Ultimately, it turns out Maelle/Alicia does not have the moral strength to overcome her addiction and grief, accomodate her two lives and come in an out of the Canvas rather than getting lost in it, despite her earlier discussion with Clea at the end of Act II, and Aline's late reappearance establishing that it's most definitely possible. Gone is Maelle's humanity and acceptance of death, and of every individual's right to choose, the initiatory journey we traveled along with her was all for naught.

Don't get me wrong, I don't mind the absence of a "happy end", nor the intent to subvert players' expectations. I just feel a (slight) disappointment that such a masterpiece did not get a more satisfying conclusion, that its forced bittersweetness is just for the stylistic sake of denying player closure one last time. For me, it comes accross as a very rare occurrence of lazy writing, with the last minute addition of Verso's last soul sliver "powering" the Canvas as obviously tired, sad and deeply unwilling, to somewhat artificially add gravitas and moral justification for Verso and his "good ending".

Of course, all this is purely my humble opinion and i fully respect divergent appreciations. All in all, this game is a masterpiece and will haunt me for a while !
< >
Showing 1-15 of 40 comments
The endings do make sense, kind of at least, if you just consider Painted Verso and Maelle/Alicia.

Where the game really dropped the ball is that there was no third ending or maybe a fourth one even. A proper Lumière ending is absolutely missing. The game pretends to be about Lumière and its people for 3/4 of its playtime, maybe even more, because Act 3, after the twist, only has one main mission really (and optional content).

I can kind of understand Painted Verso who is a suicidal sociopath, a manipulative liar and overall lousy person, he has ZERO regard for anyone, not even the one he potentially can have sex with in the game. Someone like that (a suicidal, clinically depressed person and sociopath) would do that probably.

I do not REALLY understand the sudden change of character in Maelle who is portrayed as this caring person and then, towards the end, is some kind of dollhouse queen who even repainted Painted Verso against his explicit wishes (and that after she granted Painted Alicia her wish and gommaged her). I DO understand why Maelle would want to stay though, so I chose that ending of course (the other option is mass genocide and highly immoral in my opinion).

But as I said, what is really missing is a proper third ending at least, one about Lune, Sciel, Lumière and the right of the canvas world to exist in peace, without the constant meddling by idiot gods who apparently do not comprehend the repercussions of their childish acts. So Renoir wants to destroy an entire world to save his wife? And sees no other way to get his wife out of the canvas? Really? Painted Verso is just the same, zero regard for others. Even in Maelle's ending she has zero regard for others, and it's all just about her.

Especially Maelle's ending feels entirely out of character (not the choice, but the motivation and psychology of it).

They never ever should have abandoned the Lumière storyline entirely. We need a third ending. At least a third one. And the Maelle twist in which she becomes a quasi tyrant who refuses to face reality felt entirely out of character. The Maelle in her ending and the Maelle in the game do not align at all. So maybe we need one more Maelle ending too. One in which she acts more responsibly.
[qoute]WE FOUGHT RENOIR FOR A CHANCE TO DO THE RIGHT THING[/quote]

What right thing? You must blind to not see Alicia being intoxicated by it. Like mother, like daughter
Originally posted by goodbye_bonito:
WE FOUGHT RENOIR FOR A CHANCE TO DO THE RIGHT THING

What right thing? You must blind to not see Alicia being intoxicated by it. Like mother, like daughter

Thought experiment:

the Christian god sends his son to Earth on some mission, he is expected to return to heaven the second he has accomplished that.
Said son likes it so much here that he refuses to leave and he'd rather have a wife here and a family.
God is furious but also truly concerned about his son because staying too long here in our universe kills him for some BS reason no one really cares about.
God then appears on tv screens all across the globe and announces that our universe must unfortunately be destroyed because his son simply won't listen and refuses to return to heaven. But when he destroys our universe his son will be beamed back to heaven automatically. No hard feelings! This is a kindness really! Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

How would YOU feel about that? :-D

Just because the Dessendre family consists of immature, childish idiots does not mean you should punish an entirely innocent world / civilisation for their stupid behaviour.
Last edited by Shin Happens; May 8 @ 4:26pm
Inf May 8 @ 4:33pm 
Originally posted by Shin Happens:
Originally posted by goodbye_bonito:

What right thing? You must blind to not see Alicia being intoxicated by it. Like mother, like daughter

Thought experiment:

the Christian god sends his son to Earth on some mission, he is expected to return to heaven the second he has accomplished that.
Said son likes it so much here that he refuses to leave and he'd rather have a wife here and a family.
God is furious but also truly concerned about his son because staying too long here in our universe kills him for some BS reason no one really cares about.
God then appears on tv screens all across the globe and announces that our universe must unfortunately be destroyed because his son simply won't listen and refuses to return to heaven. But when he destroys our universe his son will be beamed back to heaven automatically. No hard feelings! This is a kindness really! Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

How would YOU feel about that? :-D

Just because the Dessendre family consists of immature, childish idiots does not mean you should punish an entirely innocent world / civilisation for their stupid behaviour.
Your thought experiment ignores the eternal soul that in this example only Jesus Christ our lord and savior would have. Because for some reason, God put him in a Barbie doll house instead of on Earth to die for the sins of all people present and future. People who - again - have souls, unlike the imaginary people you so desperately defend in Expedition 33. Instead of Verso who is real and tortured for the profit of said imaginary people.

When I turn off my Gameboy I don't commit a genocide. I free up RAM
Originally posted by Inf:

When I turn off my Gameboy I don't commit a genocide. I free up RAM

Did I get that right, you just said only Jesus has an eternal soul and regular humans in a world created by god do NOT??? Really now? Now I admit, it's been a long time since I read religious texts etc but I swear nowhere does it say we humans have no eternal souls. Would be news to me if Christianity claimed humans have no souls.

About your Gameboy... do you see the little gameboy game characters do things without your input, create art, invent stuff, build cities, love, grieve, laugh, cry? And look at you utterly devastated when they realise you want to turn off the gameboy???

Your analogy is fundamentally flawed. The canvas is NOT a gameboy.

This utter disregard of treating other conscious beings with respect and love is... surprising... especially if someone were a religious person.

In my thought experiment I talk about OUR universe. The world we live in.
Aradner May 8 @ 4:45pm 
Originally posted by goodbye_bonito:
[qoute]WE FOUGHT RENOIR FOR A CHANCE TO DO THE RIGHT THING

What right thing? You must blind to not see Alicia being intoxicated by it. Like mother, like daughter [/quote]
Right thing as in undoing the damage the familiy grief did to creative work of their son, and lives of its very sentient inhabitants, then just let it be as original Verso intended it and just visit from time to time. Mother seemed way more sane when she returned to help us, even seemingly ejected herself without issue
Aradner May 8 @ 4:47pm 
Originally posted by Inf:
Originally posted by Shin Happens:

Thought experiment:

the Christian god sends his son to Earth on some mission, he is expected to return to heaven the second he has accomplished that.
Said son likes it so much here that he refuses to leave and he'd rather have a wife here and a family.
God is furious but also truly concerned about his son because staying too long here in our universe kills him for some BS reason no one really cares about.
God then appears on tv screens all across the globe and announces that our universe must unfortunately be destroyed because his son simply won't listen and refuses to return to heaven. But when he destroys our universe his son will be beamed back to heaven automatically. No hard feelings! This is a kindness really! Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

How would YOU feel about that? :-D

Just because the Dessendre family consists of immature, childish idiots does not mean you should punish an entirely innocent world / civilisation for their stupid behaviour.
Your thought experiment ignores the eternal soul that in this example only Jesus Christ our lord and savior would have. Because for some reason, God put him in a Barbie doll house instead of on Earth to die for the sins of all people present and future. People who - again - have souls, unlike the imaginary people you so desperately defend in Expedition 33. Instead of Verso who is real and tortured for the profit of said imaginary people.

When I turn off my Gameboy I don't commit a genocide. I free up RAM
Okay, very simple question, you believe Sciel, Lune and Gustav were not real people with feelings? And now when you replay the intro you'll see just dolls and not actual struggling people? And you honestly believe this is what the game was going for?
Inf May 8 @ 4:51pm 
Originally posted by Shin Happens:
Did I get that right, you just said only Jesus has an eternal soul and regular humans in a world created by god do NOT??? Really now? Now I admit, it's been a long time since I read religious texts etc but I swear nowhere does it say we humans have no eternal souls. Would be news to me if Christianity claimed humans have no souls.
On Earth, we do. In Expedition 33, we are told explicitly that only Verso and his family have a soul. In fact, his soul is what allows the world to exist at all. Which is why torturing him is so immoral. You've shackled Verso to a Gameboy and refuse to allow him to die and move on or for his family to move on. He suffers so the RAM on my Gameboy isn't deallocated.

Originally posted by Shin Happens:
About your Gameboy... do you see the little gameboy game characters do things without your input, create art, invent stuff, build cities, love, grieve, laugh, cry? And look at you utterly devastated when they realise you want to turn off the gameboy???

Your analogy is fundamentally flawed. The canvas is NOT a gameboy.

This utter disregard of treating other conscious beings with respect and love is... surprising... especially if someone were a religious person.

In my thought experiment I talk about OUR universe. The world we live in.
Yes, if I program them to do those things. That happens every day in every persistent world MMO. It's happening right now in a lot of LLM driven AI girlfriends as a service, etc.

What you're looking at is an advanced simulation. But people are more than electrical impulse. If you think you're equivalent to the people in the canvas, I suppose you can choose to lower yourself to that level. But even then, you're choosing to sacrifice Verso instead of yourself for the sake of his canvas. It's ultimately selfish, not selfless, as proven by the Maelle ending you dislike so much.

You dislike that ending because it's true.

That being said, Jesus does love you and is worthy of your devotion. If you need more guidance in that regard this religious person is open to helping you on your journey
Lucyfar May 8 @ 4:56pm 
Renoir was in the right the whole time, Verso knew it and he agreed.

Only kids agree with Alicia/Maelle, adults choose Verso side and delete the canvas.

You have to move on, time heals all wounds, you can't live in a dream world, wake up.

It's bitter and tough, but it's the most realistic ending.

I'm not gonna say i didn't cried, i cried like a little girl, but it was the right thing to do.

Aline had to move on, and so did Alicia.

Clea and Renoir were the only sane people in the family

I'm seeing a lot of ppl talking weird things about the ending of the game, does people really agree with Cypher from The Matrix? I mean, it's easier to live a fantasy then to face reality am i right? But still, reality we must face.
Originally posted by Shin Happens:
Originally posted by goodbye_bonito:

What right thing? You must blind to not see Alicia being intoxicated by it. Like mother, like daughter

Thought experiment:

the Christian god sends his son to Earth on some mission, he is expected to return to heaven the second he has accomplished that.
Said son likes it so much here that he refuses to leave and he'd rather have a wife here and a family.
God is furious but also truly concerned about his son because staying too long here in our universe kills him for some BS reason no one really cares about.
God then appears on tv screens all across the globe and announces that our universe must unfortunately be destroyed because his son simply won't listen and refuses to return to heaven. But when he destroys our universe his son will be beamed back to heaven automatically. No hard feelings! This is a kindness really! Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

How would YOU feel about that? :-D

Just because the Dessendre family consists of immature, childish idiots does not mean you should punish an entirely innocent world / civilisation for their stupid behaviour.

Friend, you approach it backwards. They created this story and ending in particular not to make sense for you, as you said. Think about it more akin classic literature, do you remember those question in a literature class? "What do you think the main message of the novel X?". And here you can see how heavy and unsettling Maelle ending is - because this is the message. They could make it happy, But why, for what? It will ruin whole purpose of writing this thing in the first place. Family should grieve together, not to escape into separate hiding holes where they can rot themselves to ruin. And that's all, there is no more to it. Everything else is just a way to deliver the message.
Last edited by goodbye_bonito; May 8 @ 5:03pm
I don't think that trying to save your wife and daughter from alienating themselves from the real world, to the point of dying of consumption in reality, in a shared RPG video game populated by chatgpt NPCs programmed by them, can be seen as "patriarchy". In my opinion it is "Love".
It is so much love that in the end Renoir gives up his own point of view (living in the real world >>> slowly committing suicide in reality by living in a fictitious world) and understands that for Alicia, decades of false happiness in a false world are preferable to decades of irremediable pain and guilt locked in a disfigured and painful body that will never allow her to have a normal and happy life. And so he lets her immerse herself in fantasy until she dies.
Originally posted by goodbye_bonito:
Originally posted by Shin Happens:

Thought experiment:

the Christian god sends his son to Earth on some mission, he is expected to return to heaven the second he has accomplished that.
Said son likes it so much here that he refuses to leave and he'd rather have a wife here and a family.
God is furious but also truly concerned about his son because staying too long here in our universe kills him for some BS reason no one really cares about.
God then appears on tv screens all across the globe and announces that our universe must unfortunately be destroyed because his son simply won't listen and refuses to return to heaven. But when he destroys our universe his son will be beamed back to heaven automatically. No hard feelings! This is a kindness really! Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

How would YOU feel about that? :-D

Just because the Dessendre family consists of immature, childish idiots does not mean you should punish an entirely innocent world / civilisation for their stupid behaviour.

Friend, you approach it backwards. They created this story and ending in particular not to make sense for you, as you said. Think about it more akin classic literature, do you remember those question in a literature class? "What do you think the main message of the novel X?". And here you can see how heavy and unsettling Maelle ending is - because this is the message. They could make it happy, But why, for what? It will ruin whole purpose of writing this thing in the first place. Family should grieve together, not to escape into separate hiding holes where they can rot themselves to ruin. And that's all, there is no more to it. Everything else is just a way to deliver the message.
Thats a pretty nice take on things!
Surprised they didn't even do other kinds of bad endings, like the whole Dessendre family dying or something, but then the painted world lives on somewhere in a museum after the manor is sold off or something.
What? Maelle/Alicia and Alina cant be trusted to use this power responsibly, its why this whole thing happens to begin with.

Renoir and Ciel are correct in trying to destroy it to force them out before they wither away and die in the real world.

The Maelle ending literally reflects the fact she cant be trusted and it has to be maintained by forcing Verso to paint until Alicia dies from overindulging it.

The whole point of this game is that you shouldn't use escapism as your only grieving method and you should rely on the family that loves you and grieve together rather than act like it never happened and escape into fantasy.

I am 100% convinced the people who have the most issue with this story are just ignoring broad swathes of the story because they became really attached to the Lumierians. And I guess that just really emphasizes why we need stories to tell these types of stories. I haven't seen this much backlash against a "Dont live in a fantasy" story since Evangelion.
Originally posted by Ratsplat:
Surprised they didn't even do other kinds of bad endings, like the whole Dessendre family dying or something, but then the painted world lives on somewhere in a museum after the manor is sold off or something.
The painted world cant live on. Them "entering" the painting is what gives the world its "life" to begin with. It just happens that this particular painting had a tiny bit of Verso's soul so it was a world that ran on Verso's ideal for the painting rather than the other Painters, until Alina and Renoir started altering it.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 40 comments
Per page: 1530 50