Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not to mention spoilers helped 33.
And then there are the real chads, Expedition 60!
"subsidize population growth" "mandates for having as many children as possible"
Not possible. The people of Lumiere were painted by the paintress. She has no way to replenish her chroma hence why her older creations are being deleted year by year. That means her ability to create new life is also dwindling. People in Lumiere can't choose to have more/less children, it's not really up to them.
There isn't much in the way of land/resources. This is part of a city that was suddenly, and violently, cast out into the ocean as an island. The amount of usable land they have and the resources within it are severely limited. Additionally the early expeditions were search and rescue expeditions. They weren't suicide missions aimed at taking down the paintress. The people on them were meant to return to Lumiere. There were still few if any survivors from those though. That shows that extracting resources from outside Lumiere was basically impossible (most life outside Lumiere was specifically designed to kill them so that makes sense).
A bunch of the expeditions already were focused on recon/logistics. eg. the climbers expedition that was all about setting up infrastructure to help climb mountains etc. for future expeditions.
You also need people to actually believe in your ideas for that kind of organisation to work too. So you'd need a person able to convince the populace that all of that would be worthwhile and would work. Ironic considering they'd be wrong about everything and would have 0% chance of success, quite the opposite in fact with a successful expedition actually dooming Lumiere rather than saving it. They'd also need to be young to avoid being gommaged. And be a coward (but somehow not lose public support due to their cowardice) so that they don't go on an expedition themselves and die.
Do you really think such a tyrannical regime could survive 60+ years? With no outside support, very little in the way of resources to prop up their regime, zero success against their enemies, and an increasingly apathetic populace. Not to mention France has a history of overthrowing tyrants.
It'd simply be impossible. Anybody with ideas such as yours likely would've lead from the front as a passionate expeditioner (and died), or been ignored by the populace and considered crazy.