Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The painters just want to paint, but the writers apparently have the ability to cause them to set fire to their own homes.
The painters(artists) just want to create art, but the writers(consultants) want to inject their own agendas into that work.
There's really not a lot to go off of, but with the themes of the game, and the fact that this point is relevant in the "real" world. I think this is sort of them getting at their reasons for what caused them to leave AAA game dev and go independent. They wanted to create their vision, and not have that become hijacked by some external factor.
This game was absolutely incredible. I'm really looking forward to their next project.
That's an interesting concept, it would mean worlds nested together, matrix in matrix ...
So yeah, I'd assume they're equals. Could possibly both use chroma too, so the dispute could be over access to chroma.