Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
testing was done solo in the arena with the same setups between them. Stendhal is void damage so both weapons have even footing on that, as for their basic attacks they would be void vs physical. Either way the results were always identical. Medalum is punching far above its weight, hitting 99M vs BB's 49M, the Lithum hit for 44M. I'd extrapolate those to assume the Medalum *should* be hitting for 39M or 78M if there's a hidden double damage effect.
This is also my theory but strictly being "double damage" doesn't explain why i'm hitting approximately 20M harder than I should be
edit: it's could be a 2.5X multiplier if the Medalum is supposed to hit for 39,726,854 (actual damage was 99,317,137)
I had a bug on that asian girl where she couldn’t get any AP on kills. I was checking everything and couldn’t figure this out. It was making her bad against groups of enemies.
It was fixed by removing her from the team and putting her back.