Devs about that dodge (TLDR the system needs refinement, better audio and visual feedback)

[EthicalPixel]

I dont mind it as much as others seem to however it seems like its getting in the way of a lot of people enjoying the game so perhaps devs can chime in if they are open to adding a toggle or auto dodge or better telegraph in a future update? maybe add a toggle for a small visual or audible clue so people who are struggling with it can learn the timing better?

i never understood why adding more options gets some people upset i feel the more things we can tweak the merrier especially ones that dont effect my enjoyment in the slightest. thats one of the benefits of pc gaming = more options

TLDR the dodge mechanic just doesnt feel great and could be better. jumping feels clunky as well

a good dodge/parry mechanic should have both visual and sensory feedback when the dodge was perfectly timed as well as a visual and audio cue that telegraphs an incoming attack. when you have this mechanic in your game it needs to be super tight

[:pensive:]

you NEED to dodge and parry in order to get back your PA and other mechanic in the game tho

do you ask everything to be tailored for even the weakest of the player? cause it ain't working like this in the real world.

[EthicalPixel]

wtf does the "real world' have to do with dodge in a video game?
the #1 rated post in here is about the dodge mechanic.
we might not have an issue with it but it is an issue for a lot of people and its less about it existing and more about it not being implemented well

:pensive:님이 먼저 게시:

you NEED to dodge and parry in order to get back your PA and other mechanic in the game tho

do you ask everything to be tailored for even the weakest of the player? cause it ain't working like this in the real world.

[Omence072]

Some people can do things , some can't.

[:pensive:]

the world isn't entitled to what you think, have a nice day :)

[Maltsi]

im all in about getting bit easier timeframes for dodging and parrying, but auto dodge is simply just stupid. Why would you even play the game at that point when you can't take damage at all?

[Balalexikon]

Why do you want a "I can't lose" Option in a game?

[Sunsetter]

:pensive:님이 먼저 게시:

you NEED to dodge and parry in order to get back your PA and other mechanic in the game tho

do you ask everything to be tailored for even the weakest of the player? cause it ain't working like this in the real world.

I dont see a problem with having automatic QTE on the lowest difficulty.

[Haruhi]

I never understand why people get so incredibly defensive when people just ask for accessibility options. How is it affecting you? If you love a game, wouldn't you want as many people as possible to play it? Including those who "suck" or have disabilities?

[EthicalPixel]

yet you are all over this forum fighting off the slightest bit of critique like your life depends on it lol take your own advice maybe

:pensive:님이 먼저 게시:

the world isn't entitled to what you think, have a nice day :)

[Maltsi]

Haruhi님이 먼저 게시:

I never understand why people get so incredibly defensive when people just ask for accessibility options. How is it affecting you? If you love a game, wouldn't you want as many people as possible to play it? Including those who "suck" or have disabilities?

accessiblity options are fine, but why should they implement god mode? There are probably cheat engines already out if you want to be unkillable

[:pensive:]

Haruhi님이 먼저 게시:

I never understand why people get so incredibly defensive when people just ask for accessibility options. How is it affecting you? If you love a game, wouldn't you want as many people as possible to play it? Including those who "suck" or have disabilities?

accessibility for disabled people, sure, but the lazy ones should find another hobby.

[EthicalPixel]

ithese settings undermine their grandiose feeling of accomplishment

Sunsetter님이 먼저 게시:

:pensive:님이 먼저 게시:

you NEED to dodge and parry in order to get back your PA and other mechanic in the game tho

do you ask everything to be tailored for even the weakest of the player? cause it ain't working like this in the real world.

I dont see a problem with having automatic QTE on the lowest difficulty.

[MrDammit]

Auto dodge? They could call it auto win!

[Zero]

Haruhi님이 먼저 게시:

I never understand why people get so incredibly defensive when people just ask for accessibility options. How is it affecting you? If you love a game, wouldn't you want as many people as possible to play it? Including those who "suck" or have disabilities?

They realize something in themselves, which they desperately try to hide, therefore hate any discussion which would break their own fantasy bubble they live in.

[Maltsi]

Zero님이 먼저 게시:

Haruhi님이 먼저 게시:

I never understand why people get so incredibly defensive when people just ask for accessibility options. How is it affecting you? If you love a game, wouldn't you want as many people as possible to play it? Including those who "suck" or have disabilities?

They realize something in themselves, which they desperately try to hide, therefore hate any discussion which would break their own fantasy bubble they live in.

I think you and the other guy here misunderstands what OP is asking. They are asking a literal immortality mode, name even one real game that comes with "accesibility" option like that?