PC Optimisation looking bad

[Lionel Messi]

I’ve been reading some tests that are reporting 4070 66fps with medium settings QHD
https://www.pcgamesn.com/clair-obscur-expedition-33/best-settings-pc-steam-deck

5090 + ultra 9 getting 70FPS natively 💀
https://as.com/meristation/mexico/clair-obscur-expedition-33-un-rpg-con-alma-que-quedara-tatuado-en-nuestros-recuerdos-n/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

I can bet from tomorrow 2500+ discussions about poor optimisation 😂

[Bizarre Lad]

Idk, they didn't specify what resolution they used. I watched a benchmark video and an rtx 4070 super can handle the game at ultra preset 1080p at 60fps.

[Lionel Messi]

Thanks for the information was it 60 locked ?
I’d have expected 60 for 4070s 1440p at least .
The game is gonna hit heavy

[Bizarre Lad]

Originally posted by Lionel Messi:

Thanks for the information was it 60 locked ?
I’d have expected 60 for 4070s 1440p at least .
The game is gonna hit heavy

It wasn't 60 locked, it was unlocked I'm pretty sure. It dips into 70 fps when traversing the world sometimes. Don't worry though, 4070s could handle 60fps at 1440p high preset.

[Zprov]

Fextralife's review stated he had stable 60FPS with a 3080ti and a 12900k at 4k.

[ComradeMertens]

4K 60 or bust.

[Lionel Messi]

Originally posted by Zprov:

Fextralife's review stated he had stable 60FPS with a 3080ti and a 12900k at 4k.

Yep l’ve seen this . If it’s possible then.. my 5070ti has a chance to handle this one

[aboutnothing]

Originally posted by Zprov:

Fextralife's review stated he had stable 60FPS with a 3080ti and a 12900k at 4k.

Probably needed to turn down some settings and use dlss upscaling to achieve that. The windowscentral review only got 50-60 fps at 3440x1440 with epic preset and no upscaling using a 4070 ti super. 1440p ultrawide is a lot less demanding than 4k and a 4070 ti super is around 30-40% faster than a 3080 ti.

[Virgo]

Originally posted by aboutnothing:

Originally posted by Zprov:

Fextralife's review stated he had stable 60FPS with a 3080ti and a 12900k at 4k.

Probably needed to turn down some settings and use dlss upscaling to achieve that. The windowscentral review only got 50-60 fps at 3440x1440 with epic preset and no upscaling using a 4070 ti super. 1440p ultrawide is a lot less demanding than 4k and a 4070 ti super is around 30-40% faster than a 3080 ti.

*14% faster (techpowerup)

[funtimefreddy]

480p let's go!

[soul like that be capable of]

Originally posted by Lionel Messi:

I’ve been reading some tests that are reporting 4070 66fps with medium settings QHD
https://www.pcgamesn.com/clair-obscur-expedition-33/best-settings-pc-steam-deck

5090 + ultra 9 getting 70FPS natively 💀
https://as.com/meristation/mexico/clair-obscur-expedition-33-un-rpg-con-alma-que-quedara-tatuado-en-nuestros-recuerdos-n/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

I can bet from tomorrow 2500+ discussions about poor optimisation 😂

i have ultra and 5090 i will check . is this without DLSS or with . the game does look mega heavy tbh . with DLAA and dlss it will get over 150fps for sure easily not way its not

[Lightdral]

UE5 sends its regards

[SiamGuts]

I have a 5800x + 3080, stable 60 FPS at 1440p high settings.

[OldManSylar]

i5-9600k, 3070, 65-70 fps at QHD, all at high settings

[causality]

Originally posted by Lionel Messi:

Thanks for the information was it 60 locked ?
I’d have expected 60 for 4070s 1440p at least .
The game is gonna hit heavy

My 2070 super can run this game at 1440p 60 fps too. I don't see the big deal about the alleged 'bad optimization'.

[shadow82]

Originally posted by causality:

My 2070 super can run this game at 1440p 60 fps too. I don't see the big deal about the alleged 'bad optimization'.

Don't forget to mention "while using upscaler at 50%". Please don't sell us magic pill here.