Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This is a fantasy setting in a game not reality. I don't recall reading LotR and thinking, "There is no way 1 being could control everybody with a ring."
As for the setting making sense. If there were no more child-bearing people in existence because an entity continues to count down then there would be no more children. Therefor the expeditions would be needed to stop said entity. This is the story as we know so far.
This doesn't account for the old guy who decimates the expedition in the demo, but the full game will probably provide an answer.
This is exactly why you don't engage regressive ideology, the celebration of newborns and family is a sign of life. The painter is a villain that seeks to take away life.
They learn to procreate at age 5 too ?