Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
especially since wokeism is something that the usa is trying to impose on the world
In France, inclusive language ("écriture inclusive") has sparked significant debate. Its goal is to make gender more visible in the language, particularly by feminizing traditionally masculine terms (e.g., "autrice" for "auteur," "ingénieure" for "ingénieur") and using forms like the median point (e.g., "les étudiant·e·s") to include both genders in written communication.
Supporters argue that:
Visibility of women: It helps recognize and highlight women's presence in various fields, challenging the traditional notion that the masculine form is gender-neutral.
Promoting equality: The language shift is seen as a step toward gender equality, as it addresses a linguistic bias that has historically marginalized women.
Critics argue that:
Complexity and readability: The use of inclusive language, especially the median point, can make texts more difficult to read and less accessible, particularly for people with dyslexia or language learners.
Tradition vs. modernity: Many see it as an unnecessary complication of the language that disrupts its historical structure.
Effectiveness: Some question whether changing language will actually change societal attitudes, arguing that concrete actions are more important than linguistic reforms.
Merci à mon ami chat GPT
...Hey wait a minute.
While games like Final Fantasy 7 and Metal Gear undeniably weave political and social commentary into their narratives, they do so in a manner that enriches the storytelling rather than overshadowing the gameplay or player engagement. The distinction I'm highlighting isn't about the absence of politics in Eastern games but how these themes are integrated - seamlessly and often subtly, enhancing the depth of the game world without compromising the core gaming experience. Western games, on the other hand, sometimes prioritize message over mechanics, leading to a noticeable shift in focus that can feel more like an agenda than an aspect of world-building. This isn't about games being apolitical; it's about the balance and integration of those elements. I'm keen to see if this new game can maintain that delicate equilibrium.
Fully agree... the Western devs that do this hit you over the head with the "message" instead of placing it in a broader context, with that broader context being the actual world they want to create, many times. Instead of letting the overall atmosphere and overarching atmosphere be dominant, you get "messages" as subtle as an elephant in a china room. And this makes the game much much worse.
Take modern RPGs, where this subtlety vs in-your-face approach is also visible. It's much like UI for many Western games (and these were the ones leading the charger) has worsened materially over the years, like it seems aimed at individuals with stubbed brains. Arrows, the infamous yellow paint on walls/floor, arrows and so on. Whereas 10-15-20 years ago, you got limited information and you actually had to read and piece information together. This made for a much nicer exploration (think Gothic series, for example, with its limited UI formula successfully replicated by Elden Ring).
I feel this because I was optimizing Horizon Forbidden West on my PC yesterday and I felt obligated to download he "Shut Up Aloy" mod
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3413673421
I mean come on bruh, you can't even look around without the character telling you what to do geez. Even worst, they talk so much that if you're going too fast for them it cut their dialogues "maybe I should do this" GEEZ I KNOW I ALREADY DID so it's even more forced.
No need to behave like a moron or to act like you're some kind of PhD psychiatrist, or social justice warrior. If you don't like the thread or don't agree with the OP, you can just ignore it.
The majority of people on this planet actually do care about this brainwashing campaign. It is you who are living in a bubble.
no reasonable white person is bothered having a black protagonist dealing with issues exclusive to black people, just you do. same goes for any other minority you put in that place.
and the "exclusion" bit is hilarious coming from a member of the group known for harassing developers out of having minorities in prominent positions in a story; you're not "excluding" white people by having a black protagonist, snowflake.