Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Ahh well, will skip this one then, each release gives me more hope for Bloodborne to hit the store though.
Maybe Ratchet & Clank is just the product of its times, and the times have changed massively from way back when.
Writing-/Humour-wise, I'd say that you can (crudely) separate the series into three categories. The PlayStation 2/Portable games, the Future trilogy plus Nexus, and All 4 One/QForce/reboot. Rift Apart fits into the "Future trilogy plus Nexus" category here. (It also doesn't continue from the "reboot" game in a literal sense - the "reboot" game is essentially non-canon to the rest of the series.)
Game-wise, you ask whether it's like "before" or "after" A Crack in Time - I'd say that it's probably "at" A Crack in Time. It's definitely not the same as the PlayStation 2 games, but (as someone who values the story and humour a lot,) comparing it to All 4 One, QForce/Full Frontal Assault, or the "reboot" game is unfair to Rift Apart.
If you want a third-person shooter that's more lighthearted than most "serious" big games these days, then you could always just wishlist Rift Apart and wait for a 50% sale someday, play it for a little under two hours, and maybe refund it if it's not your thing.
If you specifically want a PlayStation 2-era Ratchet & Clank game, then this isn't it - but is any other "big" game going to be like that, either?