Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Deathmones is right, the game has been heavily criticized by fans for simplifying so much of the original game. Not to mention the whole thing is a tie in game for the movie (it even uses movie scenes for cutscenes ffs). Does that make it a bad game? No, don't expect scores for a game to be horrible just because it was criticized.
Anyway Rift Apart isn't a sequel to the 2016 game. It's a sequel to Into the Nexus, and has a story meant to stand on it's own since it's been so long.
That said though, I wouldn't mind playing the 2016 reimagining on PC.
and second, I've followed the games industry for a long time. I mean, if a game has something controversial or something goes wrong, something called review bombing happens.
Already happened with SW BF2 2017 [www.metacritic.com] and this occurred "lightly" with Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts [www.metacritic.com]
I just wanted to understand where this heavily negative review came from and where were these people to review bomb the game? Ratchet & Clank 2016 definitely feels like Game of the Century next to BK Nuts & Bolts (word from a veteran BK fan)
Being fair the game it stand alone as a average game and not that good either.