game has no issues whatsoever stop hating

[Chris J]

i tested this game on 2 different setups. One with a 10900k and RTX 3080 and the other with a 13900k and RTX 4090 (my main rig) there is no crashes no bugs all Sonys ports are fantastic. im pretty sure alot of the haters saying its crashing blah blah just have a weak PC or dont know how to maintain one properly. Or possibly Xbox Fanboys hating on Sony,s premium quality games. God Of War had slight issues look what happened? Patched and works perfectly they even gave the game 21:9 UltraWide Support FFS what other game company has gone out their way to do that? none. Im all for criticism but when people are saying theres problems with this game or that game and i go test this myself and see no issues with it im gonna assume your just haters.

[Ghosrath]

OP says no issues, doesnt own the game xD

[Gallows]

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

Originalmente postado por Gallows:

the fact you think you need the newest state of the art hardware to run a $60 game just shows you're part of the problem.

it is what it is if people cant afford to keep up with a games demands then thats their problem not the developers. Technology has evolved so quickly and rapidly game developers wanna take advantage of these new Graphics Cards and Processors.

but yet it runs fine on a 400 dollar ps4.... your argument in invalid.

[NinjAlan]

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

Originalmente postado por D34x73r:

nice bait buddy

what bait? most of these people having issues are running AMD hardware and crying their game dont work im not even trolling the game the game legit has no problems im almost half way through the game and not had one crash. Most of these crashes people are having are due to very low VRAM on their 3080,s i dont know what else they expect from mid tier to low end graphics cards. half of the people are trying to run it on Intel HD lmao

Yeah you’re definitely trolling, the game is actually more stable on AMD (at the moment)

[Chris J]

Originalmente postado por Ghosrath:

OP says no issues, doesnt own the game xD

i have the game on Epic Store

[aweigh]

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

Originalmente postado por Ghosrath:

OP says no issues, doesnt own the game xD

i have the game on Epic Store

Suuuuure you do buddy :)

[Chris J]

Originalmente postado por NinjAlan:

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

what bait? most of these people having issues are running AMD hardware and crying their game dont work im not even trolling the game the game legit has no problems im almost half way through the game and not had one crash. Most of these crashes people are having are due to very low VRAM on their 3080,s i dont know what else they expect from mid tier to low end graphics cards. half of the people are trying to run it on Intel HD lmao

Yeah you’re definitely trolling, the game is actually more stable on AMD (at the moment)

no game is stable on AMD literally every game is optimized for Intel/NVIDIA hardware combinations always has been. Ryzen CPU,s are bottlenecking on this game but my Raptor Lake 13900k clocked at 5.6ghz is handling it very well.

[⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠]

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

Originalmente postado por NinjAlan:

Yeah you’re definitely trolling, the game is actually more stable on AMD (at the moment)

no game is stable on AMD literally every game is optimized for Intel/NVIDIA hardware combinations always has been. Ryzen CPU,s are bottlenecking on this game but my Raptor Lake 13900k clocked at 5.6ghz is handling it very well.

AMD hardware has handled alot of the new games much better then nvidia has. BUT ofc you are only interested in NVIDA/INTEL and willing to pay though the nose for it. every game i have thrown at my 7900xt has done really well with it and recently amd gpu has handled the latest release better then nvidia.

But ofc i know nothing about pc gaming and have no clue on my hardware for the many games i own

[Chris J]

Originalmente postado por Gallows:

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

it is what it is if people cant afford to keep up with a games demands then thats their problem not the developers. Technology has evolved so quickly and rapidly game developers wanna take advantage of these new Graphics Cards and Processors.

but yet it runs fine on a 400 dollar ps4.... your argument in invalid.

sigh. the game was designed to run on one specific piece of hardware PS4 when a game gets ported to PC theres always gonna be an issue to some degree because of the thousands of different hardware configurations they cant optimize for all hardware configs. people like me and many others here dont have any issues with the game. it is user end

[Chris J]

Originalmente postado por ⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠:

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

no game is stable on AMD literally every game is optimized for Intel/NVIDIA hardware combinations always has been. Ryzen CPU,s are bottlenecking on this game but my Raptor Lake 13900k clocked at 5.6ghz is handling it very well.

AMD hardware has handled alot of the new games much better then nvidia has. BUT ofc you are only interested in NVIDA/INTEL and willing to pay though the nose for it. every game i have thrown at my 7900xt has done really well with it and recently amd gpu has handled the latest release better then nvidia.

But ofc i know nothing about pc gaming and have no clue on my hardware for the many games i own

yeah i doubt that most game companies and games are optimized for Intel and NVIDIA hardware NVIDIA are the top dogs for Graphics Cards there is nothing else on par with NVIDIA AMD,s Best GPU cant surpass a 3090. NVIDIA have the lead of optimization , DLSS 2/3 , Frame generation , Ray Tracing performance is better on NVIDIA compared to AMD. PhysX all these are pioneered by NVIDIA. AMD Cards are always behind AMD try to cut corners and make hardware more affordable which means they wont get the same price to performance as a high end NVIDIA GPU like the RTX 4090 which no card can match lol

[Vox Maximus]

Originalmente postado por ⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠:

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

no game is stable on AMD literally every game is optimized for Intel/NVIDIA hardware combinations always has been. Ryzen CPU,s are bottlenecking on this game but my Raptor Lake 13900k clocked at 5.6ghz is handling it very well.

AMD hardware has handled alot of the new games much better then nvidia has. BUT ofc you are only interested in NVIDA/INTEL and willing to pay though the nose for it. every game i have thrown at my 7900xt has done really well with it and recently amd gpu has handled the latest release better then nvidia.

But ofc i know nothing about pc gaming and have no clue on my hardware for the many games i own

Name a few of the lot.

[Gallows]

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

Originalmente postado por Gallows:

but yet it runs fine on a 400 dollar ps4.... your argument in invalid.

sigh. the game was designed to run on one specific piece of hardware PS4 when a game gets ported to PC theres always gonna be an issue to some degree because of the thousands of different hardware configurations they cant optimize for all hardware configs. people like me and many others here dont have any issues with the game. it is user end

yet all the other playstation ports were pretty much fine it's about half and half now, so nah.

[Chris J]

Originalmente postado por MaxL:

Originalmente postado por ⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠:

AMD hardware has handled alot of the new games much better then nvidia has. BUT ofc you are only interested in NVIDA/INTEL and willing to pay though the nose for it. every game i have thrown at my 7900xt has done really well with it and recently amd gpu has handled the latest release better then nvidia.

But ofc i know nothing about pc gaming and have no clue on my hardware for the many games i own

Name a few of the lot.

in single thread applications or Emulators like RPCS3 my older 10900k surpassed a 5900x Intel has the advantage of higher clock speeds. Faster SSE3/SSE4 and AVX Instructions than AMD. Yes AMD made Intel step up their game a bit by making their newer CPU,s with more cores and threads but more cores and threads doesnt always equate to better performance. Raptor Lake is an absolute monster of a Processor and clocks almost to 6.0ghz now thats a fast clock speed. it took AMD ages to even match Intels Single Core performance and reach over 5+ Ghz while Intel have been doing that for years since the 4790k they dominated AMD during that time. AMD FX 8350 was beaten by s Haswell i5-4460 despite the AMD FX 8350 having more cores.

[Solid Snake]

GAME DONT WORK, ALWAYS CRASH

[⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠]

Originalmente postado por MaxL:

Originalmente postado por ⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠:

AMD hardware has handled alot of the new games much better then nvidia has. BUT ofc you are only interested in NVIDA/INTEL and willing to pay though the nose for it. every game i have thrown at my 7900xt has done really well with it and recently amd gpu has handled the latest release better then nvidia.

But ofc i know nothing about pc gaming and have no clue on my hardware for the many games i own

Name a few of the lot.

hogwarts had better performance before 2nd patch on amd hardware
resident evil 4 had major issues with ray tracing enabled amd didn't
dead space has dlss issues on launch due to vsr. people was actully told to use fsr.....?

3 of the biggest games this year was better on launch day for amd 6000 and 7000 user then nvidia

i also dont have any issues in this game also im over 100 fps at 1440p ultrawide

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

Originalmente postado por ⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠:

AMD hardware has handled alot of the new games much better then nvidia has. BUT ofc you are only interested in NVIDA/INTEL and willing to pay though the nose for it. every game i have thrown at my 7900xt has done really well with it and recently amd gpu has handled the latest release better then nvidia.

But ofc i know nothing about pc gaming and have no clue on my hardware for the many games i own

yeah i doubt that most game companies and games are optimized for Intel and NVIDIA hardware NVIDIA are the top dogs for Graphics Cards there is nothing else on par with NVIDIA AMD,s Best GPU cant surpass a 3090. NVIDIA have the lead of optimization , DLSS 2/3 , Frame generation , Ray Tracing performance is better on NVIDIA compared to AMD. PhysX all these are pioneered by NVIDIA. AMD Cards are always behind AMD try to cut corners and make hardware more affordable which means they wont get the same price to performance as a high end NVIDIA GPU like the RTX 4090 which no card can match lol

gaming has never been based around the top gpu. nvidia selling 4090 in uk for £1700 puts it out of range for a hobbie. i brought my cpu mobo and graphic card for the same price.

physx wasnt a nvidia tech they brought it yes but didn't make it. they make DLSS 3.0 and lock it to 4000 series gpu (very nice of a company to gate off tech isn't it) Whilst i like DLSS as a idea gating off versions like that to force people to upgrade .

yes amd is behind on Ray tracing you are correct its where amd lack currently im slightly behind a 3090 on my card.

look i went for 7900xt for price to performance and at the time Nvidia had nothing i will to spend the money for and the 4070ti sorry i mean nvidia 4080 12gb is priced way to bad for many people to concider.

gaming is based around what you willing to spend and the devs have to look at the big picture around how to pitch there game if we based everything on your spec's of 13900k 4090 etc pc gaming would die quickly .

[⎝⧹TrM⧸⎠]

Originalmente postado por Chris J:

Originalmente postado por MaxL:

Name a few of the lot.

in single thread applications or Emulators like RPCS3 my older 10900k surpassed a 5900x Intel has the advantage of higher clock speeds. Faster SSE3/SSE4 and AVX Instructions than AMD. Yes AMD made Intel step up their game a bit by making their newer CPU,s with more cores and threads but more cores and threads doesnt always equate to better performance. Raptor Lake is an absolute monster of a Processor and clocks almost to 6.0ghz now thats a fast clock speed. it took AMD ages to even match Intels Single Core performance and reach over 5+ Ghz while Intel have been doing that for years since the 4790k they dominated AMD during that time. AMD FX 8350 was beaten by s Haswell i5-4460 despite the AMD FX 8350 having more cores.

but thats the thing amd was dead in the water in cpu space there phatom cpu and fx was terrible vs intel. but ryzen did bring cpu's forward alot in the short span they have been here.

amd caught up with intel in many area of the cpu package even caught intel sleeping with it and intel had to up there game to keep ahead. do you think the 8700k would of had 6 cores without amd? or the 10900k have 8 cores and and max out intel ring ?

or even the 12700k i have or the 13900k with big little cores without a resurgent amd ryzen?

we need competion in the tech space we saw with intel just pushing out slight increase each year with a new quadcore cpu year after year.