You can get a refund regardless of how many hours you played. :: The Last of Us™ Part I 綜合討論

The Last of Us™ Part I

reesu 2023 年 4 月 1 日上午 11:25

You can get a refund regardless of how many hours you played.

Steam is making exceptions and accepting refunds even if you played for more than 2 hours. So anyone who isn’t happy with the game’s (awful) performance go request a refund.

Edit: And apparently an article has been published about it. Thanks to one of the users on here for posting it… https://gamerant.com/last-of-us-refund-pc-steam/

最後修改者：reesu; 2023 年 4 月 1 日下午 12:08

< >

目前顯示第 46-60 則留言，共 76 則

reesu 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 6:29

引用自 Just Chill：
引用自 RŸM：
They never ask for vids or screenshots. No need for all that.
Really?
Well I can't tell.
Haven't ever seen a successful refund for TLOU over 2 hrs, but if it works, it works. :thumb:

Definitely not gonna plan to refund it for myself. ^^

However, in combination with the gamerant-article and all the others that recently arised (there are a lot of articles out there with the same topic, I just googled about), this surely sounds promising.

Wish everyone good luck for their refund.
Personally I would recommend to wait for the patches, but it's everyone's own choice.

Nah man. The game’s performance is trash for a lot of people, even reviewers and if someone is having issues running it they should refund it instead of waiting. They can buy it later when they hopefully manage to fix everything but right now refunding is the right thing to do.

I know you like the game but we cannot keep letting the devs get away with awful optimization and performance in full priced AAA games. The devs delayed it to “enhance performance” but they clearly did not do any of that, they didn’t give reviewers early copies and also there was this strict embargo. So they very well knew about the game’s terrible performance but they still decided to release it to PC players. Blatant cash grab if you ask me.

#46

Weaver

2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 6:36

If they don't have it fixed before the two week mark I'll be getting a refund. If they do fix it I will keep the game and I'll be happy to change my review.

On a side note it's a shame that "Review Bombing" is thrown around incorrectly, like that article.

Review Bombing is bad reviews not related directly to the game itself.

Bad reviews for bad performance, bad story, bad gameplay, or anything of that nature are not review bombing.

最後修改者：Weaver; 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 6:37

#47

Just Chill 擁有 The Last of Us™ Part I

2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 6:40

引用自 RŸM：
The devs delayed it to “enhance performance” but they clearly did not do any of that

Hm, do you have a source for that statement.
Othewise... Imagine the sate of the game, when they didn't delay it.
Maybe even I wouldn't be able to run it then. :O

引用自 RŸM：
they didn’t give reviewers early copies and also there was this strict embargo.

I agree that this is a big red flag.
Think CD Project Red did the same with Cyberpunk right?

So this should always be a warning for everyone to even refund a pre-order.

For myself it turned out well and I hadn't any single crash yet. The performance is either fine, when I imagine that the original specs for ultra were a 4090 and I am still on the Turning-architecture. :O
I honestly have no idea, why it runs that well for me, but I'm not about to question it, as long as I can continue enjoying that game.

最後修改者：Just Chill; 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 6:41

#48

s0_RoNerY

2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 7:11

I refuse to. I'm sure after I do and they send out an update, the game will run normally.

#49

🍃🪻🪷Sylvie🩵🍸🍵 擁有 The Last of Us™ Part I

2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 7:27

引用自 RŸM：
Steam is making exceptions and accepting refunds even if you played for more than 2 hours. So anyone who isn’t happy with the game’s (awful) performance go request a refund.

Edit: And apparently an article has been published about it. Thanks to one of the users on here for posting it… https://gamerant.com/last-of-us-refund-pc-steam/

Not surprised. According to Steam refund policy, "even if you fall outside of the refund rules we’ve described, you can ask for a refund anyway and we’ll take a look." Of course, customers can request refund even if they have played over 2 hours and yet struggled with technical difficulty which happens the same with Batman: Arkham Knight fiasco PC port in the past.
https://store.steampowered.com/steam_refunds/

#50

Michael 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 8:14

I want to buy this game soo bad, but not until the high requirement lead to better performance. This game is ten year old and it should not have been released like this.

#51

reesu 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 10:56

引用自 Just Chill：
引用自 RŸM：
The devs delayed it to “enhance performance” but they clearly did not do any of that
Hm, do you have a source for that statement.
Othewise... Imagine the sate of the game, when they didn't delay it.
Maybe even I wouldn't be able to run it then. :O

引用自 RŸM：
they didn’t give reviewers early copies and also there was this strict embargo.
I agree that this is a big red flag.
Think CD Project Red did the same with Cyberpunk right?

So this should always be a warning for everyone to even refund a pre-order.

For myself it turned out well and I hadn't any single crash yet. The performance is either fine, when I imagine that the original specs for ultra were a 4090 and I am still on the Turning-architecture. :O
I honestly have no idea, why it runs that well for me, but I'm not about to question it, as long as I can continue enjoying that game.

“We want to make sure that The Last of Us Part I PC debut is in the best shape possible,” Naughty Dog wrote in a tweet. “These additional few weeks will allow us to ensure this version of The Last of Us lives up to your, and our, standards.”

https://twitter.com/naughty_dog/status/1621539243402174470?s=46&t=6apEx9xoJ98tp4hIiTMYZQ

#52

Vox Maximus 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 10:59

引用自 Michael：
I want to buy this game soo bad, but not until the high requirement lead to better performance. This game is ten year old and it should not have been released like this.

It's a 2022 game. Altho, you are of course correct that this kind of release of the game is a total disaster.

#53

Michael 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 11:02

引用自 MaxL：
引用自 Michael：
I want to buy this game soo bad, but not until the high requirement lead to better performance. This game is ten year old and it should not have been released like this.

It's a 2022 game. Altho, you are of course correct that this kind of release of the game is a total disaster.

It's a 2013 game with many version in between. I would take the first PS$ version being ported to the PC instead of the PS5 re-re-master.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9PFOhaKNFw

the problems though are real

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EGTMiu954w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OwanqDQBk4

#54

Vox Maximus 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 11:05

引用自 Michael：
引用自 MaxL：

It's a 2022 game. Altho, you are of course correct that this kind of release of the game is a total disaster.

It's a 2013 game with many version in between. I would take the first PS$ version being ported to the PC instead of the PS5 re-re-master.

Part 1 is built using upgraded for PS5 TLOU2 engine. It's NOT a 2013 game.

最後修改者：Vox Maximus; 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 11:05

#55

Michael 2023 年 4 月 2 日下午 11:09

引用自 MaxL：
引用自 Michael：

It's a 2013 game with many version in between. I would take the first PS$ version being ported to the PC instead of the PS5 re-re-master.

Part 1 is built using upgraded for PS5 TLOU2 engine. It's NOT a 2013 game.

The PS5 version is more of a texture remake not really any newer than the 2013 and 2014 PS4 version.

#56

Just Chill 擁有 The Last of Us™ Part I

2023 年 4 月 3 日上午 3:24

引用自 RŸM：
“We want to make sure that The Last of Us Part I PC debut is in the best shape possible,” Naughty Dog wrote in a tweet. “These additional few weeks will allow us to ensure this version of The Last of Us lives up to your, and our, standards.”
https://twitter.com/naughty_dog/status/1621539243402174470?s=46&t=6apEx9xoJ98tp4hIiTMYZQ

Well I am aware of that.
But you wrote that they clearly didn't. That's what I was speaking about (I've underlinded the part ;))
I doubt they were sitting there doing nothing.

Therefore I said, that we could imagine how broken it would have been before.

They should have taken more time than additional few weeks, to ensure no problems may arise for most of the players (it's basically impossible to cover all isses that arise for some people).

Apparently they rushed it to the end of the series to catch some more hyped people?
Taking care of technical issues is far more important.

最後修改者：Just Chill; 2023 年 4 月 3 日上午 3:33

#57