安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Ummmm, this whole thread is about someone saying you'd need a 2k pc just to match the ps5, so it's not obvious to some.
He see's the PC's I build and begs for one but they are 2 - 4k so he cant have one just yet... poor kid!
I bet you can't tell which is 4k, and which is 4k using Radeon's FSR running at the quality mode.
{連結已移除}https://snipboard.io/25DMuh.jpg
{連結已移除}https://snipboard.io/XxnKU9.jpg
****well, nevermind, I guess Steam doesn't allow me to post links.
Op hasn’t even replied
It’s just a bait thread that went in a different direction
Running a 7900 which I just purchases for 800, and last of us was free with the purchase.
But my pc was built years ago for like 1200 with an amd 2060. So, I spent about 2k....but that's 2 video cards in that cost.
So if I don't factor in the 2060, then yeah, my pc is less than 2k in cost, and that's me running the game in ultra, 4k with Radeon's FSR at quality mode. A very far cry from "you need a 2k pc just to match ps5".
Those costs add up. And you're forgetting that cost of TV and speakers, and all the games we'd need to buy. It's like how printer companies make their money not by selling printers but by charging for ink, they'll sell you one cheapish printer but then it costs you an arm and a leg to keep replacing the few drops of printer ink. That's what a console does. It effectively makes the upfront cost very cheap but makes it cost more altogether, like a credit card.
But I'm laughing at the people saying the PS5 does somethings better than PC (while being a PC itself, using the same arquitecture). So I guess it gets balanced out.
The reason resolution upscaling tech like dlss is being pushed so hard is because gpus companies like nvidia are in cahoots with companies selling you 4k tvs and monitors
They want you to go out and buy that shiny new 4k tv with your PS5 or 4k monitor with your new gpu
But at the same time 4k native rendering is incredibly demanding, so upscaling is the solution and here’s the best bit
There is no law that stops companies advertising 4k on their products when it’s not real 4k
The ps4 pro was advertised as a 4k machine and the ps5 box literally has an 8k logo on the box. Heck nvidia marketed the 4090 as an 8k card, that’s the absurdity of the situation
Straight up false advertising but no law or regulation that stops them from doing so. If it’s not native, it’s not 4k and no upscaler will produce the clarity of a native image
Exactly this. I laugh my ass off when I hear people say that you need to spend 3K+ for a gaming pc. I've been building gaming PCs since the mid 90s, and have never spent alot. Most of my gaming PCs that I've built have been sub 1k in cost.
Why not, to me there's literally no difference in visuals in what I see. I'm playing my games in ultra, and drop about 5 fps if I turn FSR off. And that's just for that one game. My other games I'm maxed out. For example, I'm playing Dead Space, 4k, ultra, ray tracing on, FSR turned off. But again, even in that game, if I turn it on, I literally don't see a difference.
Now, I'm not saying there isn't a difference, but seriously, it must be so minute, because I don't notice a difference, and I'm a graphics snob. But I've tried playing with the settings so much, I really can't tell, unless I drop FSR to something like performance setting instead of quality.
So no, it doesn't run poorly. I'm here telling you I play the game at ULTRA settings 4k (with FSR set to quality).