ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
No, I didn't pirate the game. We are playing in the living room on a shared account.
Be careful before you call someone a thief.
I mean it is a compromise of course, but it feels very very playable and I am not someone who could enjoy 30fps. But I tried this on different screens (4K TV and a normal monitor), and it worked better than expected.
Controller is an additional thing that helps here.
YOU must have a ♥♥♥♥ monitor if you cant tell the difference between native 4k and dlss. DLSS looks like blurry crap compared to native
I even loaded up the game on my sim rig that's got a 4090 in it and only the Ultra textures look good. I might have to use steam's game streaming to play the game on the sim rig but have it broadcast to the larger 65inch C2 in the lounge.
Also whats with all these new games having these super high VRAM usage but the textures aren't all that great. Metro Exodus Enhanced looks so much better at 4K than any of these newer releases and it requires RT and still performs so much better, with only the low textures starting to look muddy.
I've got 3x55inch LG C2's on my sim rig and a 65 inch lg C2 in the lounge ...... DLSS Quality looks better than native due to better AA and texture sharpening !
I haven't seen any monitors come close to the performance of the C2 in terms of HDR depth colour accuracy and latency, only downside is that it only supports 4K120 and not higher.
Well, I don't have a PS4 and the game looks gorgeous while I am happy with 50 fps. Jokes on you :)
Yeah, good question. I just recently replayed RDR2 and the textures are so crisp and there's so much environmental detail that I wonder how they manage to be well below 8GB VRAM at 4K DLSS Quality.
Something must be badly optimized.
There is by far more detail on native settings (though TAA does blur it a bit). Have you tried sharpening native? DLSS probably uses sharpening here and thats why it looks "sharper" than native, but try adding sharpening to native and you should notice textures clearer at a distance. Could be your screens aswell as the PPI is large enough to perhaps not notice the difference that much. Maybe the matte coating works to blur it further. For smaller monitors the difference is far more noticeable. For me its night and day. I use DLAA though as the anti anliasing from DLSS is usually far superior in motion.