is this laggy mess fixed?

[MCNacho-ナチョ]

i want finally play it without issuses on 120 fps. is it now possible or shouldt i wait longer?

[Jaxk]

I can finally enjoy this game. From release I'd be lucky to get 40 fps most times with DLSS on balanced and graphics on medium/low.

I now have the game running on high with DLSS on performance (doesn't look bad at all) and I can get 70-90fps which appears to be nice and smooth and the game finally has the balance of good looking graphics and smooth frames.

My rig is 2070 super, i7 13700k, 64gb 5600 ddr5 ram so my bottleneck is now my GPU at least in this game.

I am happy to play this game at this level of performance and graphics settings. I wasn't going to ruin the experience of being able to play this great game on PC with the standard the game launched in.

[Haywood Jashootmee]

whats the point in asking if you own it? sounds like bait.

[azogthedefiler25]

Publicado originalmente por episoder:

Publicado originalmente por azogthedefiler25:

...what in the hell episoder is talking about. 60 fps and below only feels good on consoles from my experience...

a console is nothing but a pc these days, so is the other way around. if you run it with minimum os or app usage. it's just native gaming. and it runs just fine if you set it up nicely. i run it on a laptop, basicly a "virtual console" slightly below ps5 specs. a ps5 S if you wanna call it that. the core runs like ps3, with a dedicated gpu. and a "fake" tv output mode of 48 Hz, if you wanna call that too. and it delivers a stable experience.

Consoles still feel better at lower fps than gaming PCs do. Especially with this game.

[episoder]

Publicado originalmente por azogthedefiler25:

Consoles still feel better at lower fps than gaming PCs do. Especially with this game.

feels? yeah. it feels good on my rig. plays very well.

i just did a casual hard run. intro to cargo+. i still gotta figure out a nice stealth route thru this one section in the beginning of the downtown area. yo

[azogthedefiler25]

Publicado originalmente por episoder:

Publicado originalmente por azogthedefiler25:

Consoles still feel better at lower fps than gaming PCs do. Especially with this game.

feels? yeah. it feels good on my rig. plays very well.

i just did a casual hard run. intro to cargo+. i still gotta figure out a nice stealth route thru this one section in the beginning of the downtown area. yo

You prefer to play below 60 fps, so of course it wouldn't bother you.

[Blacksmith77K]

Publicado originalmente por MCNacho:

Publicado originalmente por Blacksmith77K:

Agree, but some Players need to play a chess-game with 120fps...

never played on higher fps huh?

Sure, no question. First person shooter where it makes sense.
but I would never force a slow-paced third person action-adventure to 120fps... better in maxed out 4k@60fps

*only my opinion*

[Voland]

high fps is not only about being "smooth", but also about image clarity while you move camera. which is, pretty much usual thing for first-third person games.

[episoder]

Publicado originalmente por Voland:

high fps is not only about being "smooth", but also about image clarity while you move camera. which is, pretty much usual thing for first-third person games.

image clarity? the heck. you can disable motion blur. i have to disable it anyway, or i get sick.

[DJ Salad Bar]

Y'all need to touch grass, holy crap.

[best_playeros]

Publicado originalmente por episoder:

Publicado originalmente por MCNacho:

no i need 120 fps to have a smooth gaming experience. i dont play shooters.

you can have a smooth experience at 60 too. i guess you're one of those gamers with spoiled eyes. 120 fps or bust? if you don't get 120 you don't play it? that's just weird to me.

i got the game smooth at 48 fps. it's lower framerate but buttery smooth with proper sync.

technically the limit is at 72-75 Hz for the average person. the limit at where the "flicker" of the screen isn't visible anymore. you gotta be on the spot tho or you deal with optical interference. light are just waves. so is the refresh interval. having played on 144 Hz. 60 and 120 is off to me. the 48 looking smoother then 60.

Smooth at 48 fps? LOL

[episoder]

Publicado originalmente por go_fast_lose_gg:

Smooth at 48 fps? LOL

don't judge me. try it and judge the result. my monitor has 2 frequencies. i compared 60 fps on 60 Hz and 48 fps on 144 Hz. the 48 was smoother. i had severe sync issues running 30 fps, and microstutters running 60 fps on the 144 Hz. i put it where it needs to be. so...

[Hovscorpion12]

if I can play this on my handhelds at 720p/30fps, y'all can run it.

[DanielHagever]

(5800X3D,32GB 3600CL16, 7900 XTX) 21:9 2K.
Can't maintain 120 fps here. using medium/high settings.
Been trying to lock it to 100,so far it's been fairly OKAY but I still have framedrops here and there and some frametime issues occur randomly when entering new area, or when there are NPCs.
The sort of frame pacing issue you will encounter when running out of vram although i have 24gigs of vram. it feels terrible and even when the fps is in the 100s it makes it very unplayable. they go away but always come back at some point. They usually start hitting right after you pick up a paper or interact with something for some reason,seems like a bug.

BTW the game runs just fine on 60fps. none of the frame pacing issues occur when locking it to 60.
unfortunately i'm too spoiled to enjoy games at such low framerates and it feels sluggish as hell,so i cant enjoy this game very much at 60 fps.

[Blacksmith77K]

Publicado originalmente por go_fast_lose_gg:

Publicado originalmente por episoder:

you can have a smooth experience at 60 too. i guess you're one of those gamers with spoiled eyes. 120 fps or bust? if you don't get 120 you don't play it? that's just weird to me.

i got the game smooth at 48 fps. it's lower framerate but buttery smooth with proper sync.

technically the limit is at 72-75 Hz for the average person. the limit at where the "flicker" of the screen isn't visible anymore. you gotta be on the spot tho or you deal with optical interference. light are just waves. so is the refresh interval. having played on 144 Hz. 60 and 120 is off to me. the 48 looking smoother then 60.

Smooth at 48 fps? LOL

Yes AND? 48fps are perfectly sychronisable to 144Hz. Pure mathematics...

more than 100 years ago mankind already had 24 fps cinema films on celluloyd through a shutter on smooth 72 fps or 96 fps

[PRAET0R1AN™]

Publicado originalmente por MCNacho:

Publicado originalmente por Blacksmith77K:

Yes AND? 48fps are perfectly sychronisable to 144Hz. Pure mathematics...

more than 100 years ago mankind already had 24 fps cinema films on celluloyd through a shutter on smooth 72 fps or 96 fps

whhat you mean with sychonisable to 144hz?

Multiples of 1x the refresh rate..

3x 48 = 144, so he's getting 1/3 of the fps but since it's an even number ( 48 ) it should sync just fine with his monitor, that's what I'm getting from it anyway