Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
Druckman and Gross are obviously planning something big with the next game, I just hope it ties everything up.
The ending... just errrrrrrr. I dunno why they think someone would just stop right at that point, especially after cold bloodedly murdering a city of people who knew nothing about her and were mostly innocent of any wrong doing towards Ellie. Yet the main antagonist gets a free pass. Sour ending to say the least. Worst part, had Ellie never gone to find her, she would be dead anyway. So we not only spared her, but saved her also.
Maybe, but don't you think that since Joel was now living a "normal" life that he might had "gone soft" and that in-turn could had been his demise. Think about it. He got soft. If you watch the Ellie flashbacks with her and Joel it looked like to me anyway that his attachment towards Ellie was a bit too much. its why he wouldn't let himself get emotionally attached to anyone in the world that he now lived in, because people dies all the time. It was just too painful. When Joel and Tommy came across Abby they had a very different mindset because life was now "normal" which in the world that they lived in could make you weak.
It's hard to prove that game (or film/TV show) is objectively good or bad, that's why these discussions continue to happen. The way someone feels about a story is inherently subjective, two people can play the same game and each one walks away with a very different opinion of the narrative and different perspective on what it means. TLOU has an insane production value with some of the best examples of high quality level design, 3d modeling, animation, cutscenes, etc and most people agree those aspects are high quality.
But the story is the most divisive part of the game and has always had people disagreeing. Even though I think it is, at the end of the day, worth playing, it's also worth listening to other people's opinions. Because there are some rough spots to the story and I didn't even realize some of them until reading threads like this one.
Edit- and it's hard to take GOTY seriously, how is it fair that Hogwarts legacy was completely omitted last year? I'm not saying it's necessarily political, but the game awards does have some gatekeeping going on in terms of which games are allowed to be part of the conversation.
No ♥♥♥♥ revenge is bad, we're taught that in first grade - I didn't need 20 hours of misery porn to understand that.
This person makes a good point. I think someone once said that it’s a writer’s responsibility not to give in to hopelessness, but to rise above it somehow.