THIS GAME WITH FSR 3 IS GONNS BE AWESOMEEE!!!

[Hiensi]

FSR 33333!!!!! wooooooooo babbbyyy

[Jedimindtrickonyou]

Why do people get so excited about FSR3? It's really overrated, I have a 40 series card and only find it useful for counteracting the performance hit of using path tracing.

[ProperCharva]

you gotta be joking hahahahahahaha

[potato]

it's gonna be the same game, i think

[LaziShoT]

idk i agree i thought i would use Frame Gen way more than i do i wanted to bad but it usually makes the game run worse lol it my experience so far i think thaey have more bugs to work out with the frame gen in some games this is my opinion ofcourse

[ProperCharva]

100% it does you need a pretty high fps to begin with usually

[Jedimindtrickonyou]

Originally posted by LaziShoT:

idk i agree i thought i would use Frame Gen way more than i do i wanted to bad but it usually makes the game run worse lol it my experience so far i think thaey have more bugs to work out with the frame gen in some games this is my opinion ofcourse

Especially Unreal Engine 5 games, it runs terrible with those game (in my experience). I thought it would be more interesting too until I got a card that supported DLSS FG (which is arguably better than FSR since it has dedicated hardware) and I still find it underwhelming. I hope they can make both FSR3 and DLSS FG better over time, but it's not worth getting excited about, it either runs smoothly but looks bad, or looks ok but causes issues with weird frame times (sometimes you get the worst of both scenarios).

[JD]

I play at 4k native. FSR means nothing to me.

[Jedimindtrickonyou]

Originally posted by Face Diaper:

I play at 4k native. FSR means nothing to me.

Just dropped by to tell everyone how elite you are

[HappyDroplets]

Definitely agree these tools are getting better, and are great for older cards, just wish they optimised games better for the newer cards instead of using the tech as a crutch that's needed day 1 just to play some games.

[mhmtkfz]

fsr3=reduced resolution. I prefer to play at native resolution with frame generation.

[Gitaroo]

I hope DLSS 3 FG is also included. Fsr3 has terrible frame pacing.

[Jedimindtrickonyou]

Originally posted by Gitaroo:

I hope DLSS 3 FG is also included. Fsr3 has terrible frame pacing.

It would be weird for them not to include both, but it’s hard to say until ND or Nvidia announce something. Didn’t AMD break the news about FSR3 (coming to TLOUP1)?

And FSR3 *can* work almost as well as DLSS FG, it just depends on if the developers implement it properly. Like Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum got bad versions of FSR3, but then following games like Avatar and Talos Principle 2 have much better implementations of FSR3. Most people thought it was down to those first two games getting like a beta version of FSR3, but that theory was kind of messed up by the fact that Robocop RC just got a busted version of FSR3 a few days ago.

[GamerGate Valkyrie]

this game is still trash in performance, even with fsr3 if it comes to that

[Wurst Kaese Szenario]

My TLOU game runs much super smoother with my Nvidia gpu when using DLSS. From what i've experienced in games with these Fake FSR 3 preview drivers AMD's upscaling mode is only a joke. Higher Frames shown, but not noticeable. The same in Alan Wake 2: Nearly unplayable with my RX 6650 XT, even in lowest settings, but smooth like icecreme with an RTX 4060 in high settings (DLSS and Frame Generation, of course). Now i know why so many players uses Nvidia gpus.

[Jedimindtrickonyou]

Originally posted by Wurst Kaese Szenario:

My TLOU game runs much super smoother with my Nvidia gpu when using DLSS. From what i've experienced in games with these Fake FSR 3 preview drivers AMD's upscaling mode is only a joke. Higher Frames shown, but not noticeable. The same in Alan Wake 2: Nearly unplayable with my RX 6650 XT, even in lowest settings, but smooth like icecreme with an RTX 4060 in high settings (DLSS and Frame Generation, of course). Now i know why so many players uses Nvidia gpus.

Is ice cream smooth, though?

But yeah Nvidia is ahead in terms of their features/software, AMD is always playing catch up. It's a shame because on one side you get the best RT perf and best upscaler but not enough VRAM + a higher price. On the other side, you get good raster and a large frame buffer but ugly upscaling tech, worse to significantly worse RT and very rarely any innovations or game changing features (unless they're just doing their best to make a second rate version of something Nvidia created- like FSR3 trying to match DLSS FG). They just added RTX HDR, they are always adding new features and AMD can't match them in quality.