Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's not the fact he would kill to protect them - any clown would kill for spare ammo then - he would die to protect them.
True, I'd never question that. The question is, does that alone make him a person we should sympathize with? Let's look at The Godfather for contrast. Vito Corleone had a deep love for his children and would clearly die for them, and I'd even argue that he is morally superior to Joel in other aspects of his character, yet he is still perceived as primarily a villain (albeit a complex one), while Joel is generally perceived as a hero.
You empathize with the person because of their love for a cared-one.
The rest, villain/hero/anti-hero/whatever is all powerfantasy.
The empathy and the powerfantasy are separate entities:
- the first ties you to emotionally to the second (which can be DonColeone-villain or IronGiant-hero)
Narratively, you can whitewash a lot of horrific, genocidal sht if you get a good script/direction/execution/hook. Dracula/Werewolves.
I see. But it's still difficult for me to understand why people empathize with him to the point of glorification on online forums, downplaying or completely overlooking his villainous aspects.
Yeah, I fully agree with that.
"... The empathy and the powerfantasy are separate entities ..."
"... point of glorification on online forums ..."
- mask-on motives, layers and layers (eg. why do people glorify preppers, why 2A)
This is too big(and inflammatory) to unpack in a thread and would probably derail this thread.
Your original question was why do they love Joel despite the stuff he did. (motive)
Not why do people glorify what Joels does. (means)
"... The empathy and the powerfantasy are separate entities ..."
greentext: 6x lines to avoid 6x words
True, but interestingly, as I pointed out in the first paragraph of my original post, some people seem incapable of empathizing with Joel without glorifying everything he did in the game. That's what surprises, and honestly, scares me a little, and it's the main reason I launched this thread.
Joel has a broad fanbase: (it's a Venn diagram).
- people empathize with him
- a smaller group that glorify violence
The glory-crowd sometimes empathize with Joel, but it's not essential.
They'd happily play a game just for the memes. Deus Vult
- You're assuming 'empathy' drew them to the game - it was just the icing.
But this is most games, no?
- probably a nuance of seeing explosions vs watching someone's panicked face glaze over as you choke them out.
Yeah, possibly.
But this is most games, no?
- probably a nuance of seeing explosions vs watching someone's panicked face glaze over as you choke them out.
By quite a lot of people, apparently.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TheLastOfUs2/comments/i5ffoq/for_me_joel_is_the_real_hero_of_the_2013_game/
I like Ellie, that's the real star of the show. Furthermore, I also like Joel but in a different way. He's someone who get things done, no matter what: even if he has to walk over corpses. That's total anti-heroic. From my perspective, he's destroyed, but still alive for the simple cause of being existent.
Ellie gives his life a sense. But his choices are - in many ways, conflicting and egocentric. You know what happens in Part II with him, and Abby. They pay. It's like a descent. I'm sorry for Joel, because (his) life made him of what he is.
Bottom line is, I really appreciate that I can think about the game. I'm very impressed by the story, it has its depths, I like to see how it will continue in Part III.
That's a reasonable opinion. And I agree: the best part of this game is that it's thought-provoking. I haven't played Part II yet, but will probably pick it up if it gets a PC release.
And the characters and their behavior are absolutely logical and understandable.
In part 1, Joel becomes a father figure for Elli.
or Elli becomes the daughter that Joel couldn't protect and now tries to do everything he can to help Elli... In the end, he even puts her life above humanity's possible chance of healing.
A questionable and provocative decision...but also a realistic and exciting one.
The life of any child in Africa does not affect us as much as that of family and friends...if the relationship is close.
I would even say ... their are many ppl out their who put the life of their dog over human life (ppl they don´t know) ... maybe it´s legit :D
Good dog > bad human
-------- (part 2 spoiler)
In part 2 It turns out that the brilliant doctor who would probably have gotten a cure out of Ellis' head (which would have resulted in her death) was Abby's father.
And Joel killed him...for Ellis' life.
Abby wants revenge for her father and for Joel's selfishness...
Abby gets her revenge...but revenge takes revenge...
Elli wants revenge for Joel...
Friends on both sides are dying... it keeps building up...
... and in the end, despite all the hatred that has built up, there is forgiveness.
Because there is mutual understanding and insight.
In the end it is forgiven (for the moment)...but not forgotten.