Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah, I figure it must have something to do with that. Haven't played many games that take shader caching this far, but I gotta admit, the graphics look gorgeous, so definitely worth temporarily sacrificing some storage :P
IKR, but the funniest part is my PC is prebuilt, and it's only 3 years old, which almost makes you wonder why they haven't phased them out. Probably has to do with money though, I mean the simplest answer is that it's cheaper.
Don't know what GPU you use, but on the Nvidia driver you can determine the file size for shader compilated files.
Nevertheless,reducing those sizes will cause heavy stuttering or crashes of applications. For a proper fix, you need a bigger storage device.