Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Joel did not choose well, he chose the lesser of two evils. Or the greater, depends on who you ask.
That's the beautiful thing about this series, that there are no simple and clear-cut answers. That it inspires discussion.
Shotgun to the face was the correct course of action.
Cordyceps isn't a virus, so IDK if it would evolve to become less lethal. The infected are still "alive" after all.
Agreed. Unfortunately, the game creators aren't actually medical researchers in the treatment of communicable fungal pathogens, so their theory of why they had to kill Ellie was absurd and unnecessarily immoral — that's my only point, and also that if the end is too depressing for you, it's possible to think of it as actually being positive.
True, but their infection makes them far more likely to be killed by the uninfected than would an innocuous mutation, doesn't it? So innocuous or helpful mutations would be way more successful—that's how evolution works.
Joel is a thug, shaking down people in the slums for cash. He's not exactly a hero. However, by the end of the game he does take responsibility for Ellie.
The vibe of the game is that the human world is dying. When Tommy's group got a generator working they would not likely have the resources to maintain that generator long term. However, it offers a short period of hope for a few survivors.
The game is just a slice of what it is to be in a dying post-apocalyptic world.
if anyone thinks the fireflies wouldn't have abused the vaccine to gain support and wage war, you are definitely naive and that is if they managed to do that all. they could have killed ellie and gained nothing in the process. what then? the group would have splintered nonetheless because no one is willing to be a mindless canon fodder for a future, they probably won't even experience themselves.
I speak out of experience here, since I have witnessed it first hand what these leftist groups or their extreme versions tend to do. my great uncle was lured by these ♥♥♥♥♥, sent into battle with just the most rudimentary training for the right of the workers and he lost everything in the process. he was a genius and could have become one of the leading experts in medicine but thanks to propaganda and peer pressure, he threw his life away and never recovered when he found out that their leaders betrayed them and sold them out to the government.
he still lived his full life but was completely broken and never allowed to attend university again.
imo all of these post apocalyptic stories, don't take into consideration that not everyone is going to lie down and die but it's artificial drama that people like, so they keep feeding them that.
And as you can see, they succeeded.
They didn't offer Ellie a choice which is just straight up murder of a child. There were no guarantee they could develop a cure.
The fireflies are just as much thugs as the others, as shown how they treat Joel after he got Ellie all the way to him, they knocked him out while performing CPR, and then when he was told to leave the guy guarding him was antagonistic the whole time.
The Fireflies could never be trusted to actually distribute a vaccine, if they could even manufacture it.
The end part of the story was weak in my opinion, the whole rush to operate on Ellie, they had no time to run any sort of comprehensive tests and were going to kill the only viable person. They just did that to force Joel into some sort of action.
The only thing I found fault with was Joel lying to Ellie, but I can understand that in a way as he was afraid of loosing the most important person in the world to him.
Also idk why it sounds selfish, in general parents will do anything to protect their kids, that's just how it is.
A "false perspective"??? Even more so "worthless"??? It is not so much that somebody is considered worthless in such a world, but that among the survivors were those that had a gang mentality. It is a failed state.
There was a TV show called "Revolution" with a broader look at the Nation. It wasn't a Zombie story, but rather the premise is that we lost the ability to provide electricity for modern technology that set the entire world back 100-200 years. Some regions collapsed into a failed state, but others did not. The city of Atlanta GA was portrayed as having rebuilt itself into a successful Steampunk industrial society.
Nobody is shown as lying down. They are just not banding together for the common good. The situations are escalated to life and death, and typically needlessly.
The supply trucks were frequently shown to be struggling. Farms were being overrun either by zombies or bandits or both.
Two interpretations:
1. Joel became emotionally attached to something he was afraid of losing.
2. Joel felt a responsibility, a duty, to protect something that could not protect itself.
The first is selfish, the latter could happen even if his feelings had not yet grown that strong. Ellie might not be his "2nd daughter", despite Joel being Ellie's father figure.