Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It might have been "remastered" twice before, but the underlying code likely the same
Have you waited for the shaders to compile?
Lol.
Its not the same, its a game build with a new engine.
It hasnt been remastered twice either.
It got one remaster and one remake.
For me the shaders are taking so long....
and the system requirements
Thanks ^^
Rebuilt from the ground up or ported?
I don't know the answer to that and I expect it's an important factor.
If it was ported to new engine etc then yeah a lot of the original game stuff is still there and modified which will be significantly different from the game being completely rebuilt/recreated in a new engine and optimised for it.
Considering all the performance issues I'm seeing on here I expect the former is the case.. or it could just be the game isn't well optimised for PC which could also be true.
Remember when the Arkham games were ported to a new engine and looked and ran worse than the originals?