Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Or on the second or third times through either! This is an interesting lore post, nice discovery and well done!
"Child, you do not understand what you speak" something like that.
I suspect that the younger generation, those who aren't familiar with the Fires of Ibis more directly (since it happened like 50 years ago), likely twisted the original mantra and meaning without really understanding its origins that well.
Because he's only the founder, Flatwell is the leader.
But you're saying Abide by Rubicon means stays at Rubicon.
Isn't that what Domaylan kind of want? Especially when he's oppose to Coral Release.
I think Abide to Rubicon has a more "We should all reach Contact with Coral" means to it, consider it's a phrase he created in his younger, Seria days.
We aren't talking about "Umbasa," or "Praise the Sun," here.
There is a war-torn, planet-wide, full scale power struggle between corporations. Abide by Rubicon is an over-used "one nation under god/united we stand" saying. You can even hear it in most of the VA's tone. They don't sound like they want to say it, they sound like they are being MADE to say it and have a tone of being sick of uttering the phrase, as a way of pledging allegiance to their nation.
My vote is that Flatwell / the rest of the RLF are on board with Dolmayan's perspective and have been from the beginning. Otherwise, why would they go to all the trouble of doing a high-risk prison-break operation (mission 9-B, Prisoner Rescue) to put Dolmayan back in charge?
Even in the "Liberator of Rubicon" ending, you're still effecting a kind of least-worst containment scenario as far as the RLF is concerned, where you cause a Coral reaction on Rubicon but stop it from spreading anywhere off-planet.
I can only speak for the language I understand.
I just saw a scientific video discussing Coral around the world. Coral is the only species on this planet with no brain, no eyes, no ears etc. yet it can communicate with other coral species around it. It covers a huge percentage of the planet, and as long as the species of coral is the same, they all spawn and grow in sync no matter where they are in the world, so if coral is growing in abundance in the bottom of the ocean, and have a coral in a fish tank, they both would spawn and grow at the exact same time.
Hmmm, and the Coral in this game is taking over the planet, and can communicate telepathically with certain "host" subjects.
Based on a true story? or fact at least lmao.
But interesting take you have. i am still trying to piece both endings together. bc while ayre wasn't super disappointed with you during the liberation of rubicon ending, she still didnt sound satisfied; but in NG++ her attitude was completely different.
I thought Rubicon wanted to protect the Coral and preserve as you said, let nature live. so having those two alternate endings really confuses things.
Interesting, thank you for that perspective. So it seems like the wordplay also holds in the JP VO -- you could read that as either "may Coral be with us" like you say, or you could read that as "Coral must ONLY be with Rubicon."
You're right though, it's hard to draw much meaning lore-wise from differences between the translations. Still, I'd love to see a transliterated version of Dolmayan's speech in that NG++ mission, just to see if there were any differences in intent or expression there between JP and ENG.