Arma Reforger

Arma Reforger

Statistiken ansehen:
DLSS
Any chance Bohemia is going to add Nvidia DLSS to the game? I think it would boost FPS enormously
Ursprünglich geschrieben von CalicoJack:
This is what i´ve seen lately.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Rick James Bish:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3396756824

Doesn´t look like it´s of much importance for BI to add DLSS to Reforger.

It would be nice though because the option we have now, internal resolution scaler + FSR, is just rubbish.

For now, if you have a nvidia gpu and want to have a better performance without sacrifying too much of the picture clarity, you are better off using Nvidia NIS resolution. (although, that means you have to change/lower your desktop resolution everytime before you launch Reforger due to no actual Fullscreen support in the game).

< >
Beiträge 3145 von 47
Ursprünglich geschrieben von RunForRest:
Singleplayer Szenario
5600x|6700xt @1920x1080 medium preset 100% reso almost 90 fps.
But imo looks to bad. I can go to high preset and even increase some settings and get above 60 fps. When i than set resoltuion to 70% with Fidelity FX enabled, lock fps to 60 and than use Losless Scaling and double them to smooth 120 fps. Looks amazing and runs amazing.

Nice 90 is good at medium preset and native. I think 90 - 100 fps is the sweet spot and runs perfect for this game.
DLSS, XESS, and FSR 3.1 should all be added. The upscaling, and resolution scale in this game is pretty bad. DLSS would be a massive improvement in performance with almost no loss in perceptible visuals for many.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Molitovmichelle:
Enjoy your fake frames bb.
lmfao how come i can play dying light 2, specifically looking for dlss issues and not find them? infact dlss looks better

bet you use an amd card and are just jealous that nvidia is better, dlss is the future, deal with it
BIS are an Indie developer and not a triple A studio. Don't expect miracles just because they are successful. people tend to forget they are playing a niche Indie game.

I would love to see more features too.
They probably release DLSS right after they fix the games netcode and server stability issues.


Hopefully before the end of this year?
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Ibuprofen; 16. Jan. um 7:22
the game has dlss... nvm i lied lol
Zuletzt bearbeitet von XDeathxReconX; 16. Jan. um 18:54
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Frag:
Fake frames and higher latency in an FPS game? No thanks...
dlss is upscaling
Ursprünglich geschrieben von rckrz6:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Frag:
Fake frames and higher latency in an FPS game? No thanks...
dlss is upscaling
Newer versions of DLSS use interpolation. It examines two frames and then uses AI to compare those two to determine what the frame(s) between them would look like. It then generates those frames and inserts them. I think DLSS 3 generates 1 frame and DLSS 4 generates 3.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Rick James Bish; 17. Jan. um 4:34
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Rick James Bish:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von rckrz6:
dlss is upscaling
Newer versions of DLSS use interpolation. It examines two frames and then uses AI to compare those two to determine what the frame(s) between them would look like. It then generates those frames and inserts them. I think DLSS 3 generates 1 frame and DLSS 4 generates 3.
that is with frame gen turned on dlss 3 without frame gen is dlss 2
Ursprünglich geschrieben von rckrz6:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Rick James Bish:
Newer versions of DLSS use interpolation. It examines two frames and then uses AI to compare those two to determine what the frame(s) between them would look like. It then generates those frames and inserts them. I think DLSS 3 generates 1 frame and DLSS 4 generates 3.
that is with frame gen turned on dlss 3 without frame gen is pretty much dlss 2
I think we all have to remember here that Nvidia 5000 graphics cards and into the future are being build very different. Any game that does not follow with these modern features will be left in the performance dust as Ai based tech rules the roost. AMD's implementation is way behind I have no idea why people hold onto or jump on a band wagon that Nvidia has been leading now for years in. Why spend you hard earned dollars on a worse experience. I say buy what gives you the best performance and visual quality etc and who can actually argue in 2025 that not being an Nvidia card. So DLSS 4 should be considered a priority if this engine wants to run well on modern rigs. Until the other hardware makers catch up and release a leading card then don't sacrifice for old brand loyalty garbage. The GPU is the single biggest difference as the CPU becomes an after thought.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von CREAMY_FLAPS:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Frag:
Fake frames and higher latency in an FPS game? No thanks...
That is not what DLSS does...
see, this is what happens when uninformed people echochamber other people opinions who also don't have a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ clue
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Frag:
Fake frames and higher latency in an FPS game? No thanks...
Always gonna be someone trying to be different with their opinion.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Frankie1k8:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Frag:
Fake frames and higher latency in an FPS game? No thanks...
Always gonna be someone trying to be different with their opinion.
The best thing about this tech is it will get better. So frame generation and future DLSS means a lot more frames...hopefully
Yes please at the very least DLSS upscaling, FSR isn't really that good. It is ok but DLSS is superior in any way and has been for ages, maybe this will change in the future and FSR will take the lead but doubt that very much unless Nvidia scraps gaming fully.
< >
Beiträge 3145 von 47
Pro Seite: 1530 50