Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You know that's literally what the Arma series has been about. The SP campaign has always been secondary to the multiplayer experience.
To you maybe, but I prefer singleplayer/campaign stuff with a good story. Oh well.
i disagree and we had very different experiences then. especially pvp was always the least played and interesting part to me and many that i knew.
Operation Flashpoint was about the SP campaign. There was a poll in which they found 60% of users prefer SP/Editor play.
So far the SP doesnt look strong here boys -be wary
Where do people come up with this bs? I swear multiplayer is a curse on gaming. Games are actively made worse to accommodate it. Then again for some reason SP became all about the "cinematic experience" at some point so I can see how new gamers would value MP over that ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Somewhere good gameplay just got removed from the table, giving us a bunch of garbage until something like Elden Ring breaks the mold and actually focuses on good gameplay over MP and cinematic bs.
In any case I'm curious how salvageable this is from an SP perspective. I don't GAF about a campaign, but if the editor works and you can get some scenarios going, I'd buy this right away. However with the emphasis on MP causes me to assume this is a waste of time and money.