does this game run good?

[WolfPax]

does this game actually run good? or does it still run bad like its predecessor arma 3.

and also is it worth buying and wasting my time over?

[Yakubian Demon Magick]

it runs gooder than arma 3, mostly because there is less environmental destruction and it is cross platform. i usually turn everything down because most servers are using tons of custom textures and such but if you have a good rig you can easily run it pretty smooth.

[Skee 11B/CIB]

I suggest using the Steam 2 hour refund limit to see what you think. It's hit or miss. It's on sale I think so take advantage of that. In terms of performance, I think it's marginally better than Arma 3 but not by a wide margin. I run 1440p with 4070Ti and i have to turn everything to medium to play at my preferred 120 fps. I'm assuming you can run higher settings at 60fps. But I doubt it'll play ultra at 1440p over 60fps. YMMV. Take that for what its worth.

[Matthew 6:33]

i get 80-100 fps most of the time it does drop to 60-70 consistently though (playing on 1440p high settings but i adjusted to ultra textures and low grass) rx 7800 xt, i5 12600k , 32gb ram, installed on m.2 ssd

[30 Year Mortgage]

Originally posted by WolfPax:

does this game actually run good? or does it still run bad like its predecessor arma 3.

and also is it worth buying and wasting my time over?

How is anyone supposed to answer this thoroughly if you don't list your system specs? Also - plenty of people run arma3 fine - as well as reforger.

[WolfPax]

Originally posted by GraboidHunter55:

Originally posted by WolfPax:

does this game actually run good? or does it still run bad like its predecessor arma 3.

and also is it worth buying and wasting my time over?

How is anyone supposed to answer this thoroughly if you don't list your system specs? Also - plenty of people run arma3 fine - as well as reforger.

1. im im surveying peoples experiences, if you really wanna know then Im on a 3080 and 5800X3D.

2. As for your inevitable claims of "run arma 3 fine" Maybe they do but anything below 100 frames is considered the 'fine' range and multiplayer craps the bed into the low 40s during combat in arma 3 even on a modless server. the game runs on 1 thread anyways so that begs the question why would I settle for crap frames when I'm in fact spending hundreds on hardware for more frames? That's counterintuitive thus at this conjuncture it's why I'm hoping it has improved in reforger.

[Matthew 6:33]

Originally posted by WolfPax:

Originally posted by GraboidHunter55:

How is anyone supposed to answer this thoroughly if you don't list your system specs? Also - plenty of people run arma3 fine - as well as reforger.

1. im im surveying peoples experiences, if you really wanna know then Im on a 3080 and 5800X3D.

2. As for your inevitable claims of "run arma 3 fine" Maybe they do but anything below 100 frames is considered the 'fine' range and multiplayer craps the bed into the low 40s during combat in arma 3 even on a modless server. the game runs on 1 thread anyways so that begs the question why would I settle for crap frames when I'm in fact spending hundreds on hardware for more frames? That's counterintuitive thus at this conjuncture it's why I'm hoping it has improved in reforger.

oh yeah it performs way better in combat vs arma 3

[cordova.jojo42]

runs great. i can even play on my steam deck and hotspot

[Mr. Do Everything]

Sir this is an Arma game.....

[fidget]

reforger is the inverse of 3; the GPU is heavily used while the CPU doesn't get much action, but it should still be a decent CPU despite this.
i get 60fps at 720p on an R7 2700 and GTX 1060 6GB with settings similar to the Xbox Series S, though the game can still dip down to 40 (but it does that on the XSS anyway).

game could really benefit from fsr 3 integration