Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
here is performance on a 4060ti and ryzen 5 3600. Runs decently on medium at 1440p
Even with my Highend System 7950X3D, 64 GB DDR5, RTX 4090 OC i have "only" 80-100 fps in 4K, not more, cause no DLSS and FG, but its ok, the game is smoothy and i can play it with Ultra (Cinematic) Settings. I have no fps drops or something like that.
fym "the game is not designed for 100+ fps"? What kinda cope is that???
There's zero reason double exposure should run as poorly as it does, it's a life is strange game. The environments look pretty, but nothing revolutionary that justifies it running this poorly.
If you're happy with your $3,000+ setup only being able to run a story game at 90fps then power to u ig, but remember 90% of people do NOT have a 4090, more likely a 4070 or below.
Humm very strange (as the game hu ? hehe) i have notice that MUCH people seems to have bad performance hardwise wise i mean. With an rtx 3090 FE and old 9900K and 32go i get in the 75 to 85/90 fps in 4k Ultra everything except the very bad one witch is know to have VERY bad performance wise
The second slider for scaling (blur, lighning etc witch it describe) if you put to 100% you can be sure it will be very bad for performance, 50% or 60% yes could be good.
Main problem i could actually it's visually BAD for 4k , smearing etc
But performance is good IF only you don't to maxxed out the second slider for sure or i really like EVERY game in fact going from 2015+ and more: NEVER use Ultra settings witch doesn't scale at ll.
For vram wise in some cases by experience shadows doesn't only affect vram but ALSO performance (but not all cases)
Put high on everything and say some in normal or other and try to slide to 70% the second slider would be MUCH BETTER rendering for sure.You can be sure that the rendering quazlity will be much better for precision with no loss in quality effect in fact.
Except shadows on low i agree
Honestly i am more surprise that a UE5 (not UE4 but UE5 much more heavy) game like that WITHOUT upscaler and other is able to keep on.
Thanks for response