Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I guess that was the mindset of the original price for the console but some people are able to create masterpieces within those limitations. On my own opinion I consider the EO series more valuable than modern AAA releases but that is purely my subjective view.
Nobody is saying DS games are bad. I'm willing to bet most people are hear because they loved the original ds games.
But DS games were much more cheaper to develop than almost any game today.
Games are multimedia art pieces. Art can change in value over time.
Not sure how young you'd have to be to think of DS games as "very old." That said, I don't really see the argument of "old" meaning it has to be priced less than "new." I'd still pay full price for a straight port of many classic Famicom games compared to things coming out today. Quality is quality. There's a reason Sekaiju no MeiQ 3 is still going for over 10000 on Amazon. I won't argue that lower prices are better for me the consumer, but just being "not a completely original and new title" isn't really an argument IMO.
I'm a huge fan of the series, as i've said before. I've probably put in 2k hours in between all the games. So yeah I also feel they are masterpieces.
I don't feel the content they are adding justifies the price today, as you get so much more production value with other games of similar value. I feel the 3 should of been bundled as one AAA price.
They may have even made more money doing that. As they will obviously driven more sales. That is debatable though.
1ST OFF i am not one that is complaining about the price but they where not 60 dollars when they 1st came out they where 39.99 and i think the remastered 3ds ones where 29.99 i do not know where you are getting your price of them being 60 dollars from but that sounds like some shady gamestop or something man.
I think it's reasonable to not be happy about the price. My motivation for creating the thread was to express my disappointment of those calling to boycott the games or to just slander the series/developer/publisher without offering anything of use.
Why are people saying the games are 60 dollars I have never seen an Etrian Odyssey go for 60 dollars why all the miss information
Um no...
AAA games for me run $60-80. this bundle is $107 at 33% off.
since those were cart based and had to be made in factory's
most consoles began shifting to partial on disk and rest download around ps3 i think
or empty cases with redeem codes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_video_games_to_develop
does not have these most likely but shows costs of development of some games
or highest better put of some
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etrian_Odyssey
https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2023/03/sega-explains-why-etrian-odyssey-origins-collection-costs-usd80
Sounds like you got hit with bad regioning then - AAA games here are in the 8-9000 yen range (Armored Core 6 is going for 8690 here on Steam for comparison), and this bundle here is 8979. The physical is actually cheaper, as I got that for 7360.
70$ without any deeper digging for discounts about 60 think on humble with choice
unsure of your region, but there are discounts around have been
EO games were $40 ish in my country on DS. That is with a cart, packaging, sometimes even special edition boxes at no extra cost.
They don't have the cart to factor in that price today. But we do have inflation, so kind of a wash there.
They justify the price by the amount of content(link you gave). Listing 80 hrs over 3 games. By that justificaiton if they had 200hrs of content they could charge $200.
Which we know is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.