I can't even get passed any of the initial levels without using hints. Refunded

There's no directional pad controller support, so point-and-click controls for this type of game on Steam Deck is unenjoyable.

Not inherently bad, but quite boring to play.

I enjoyed hexcells, tametsi, etc, but this title didn't work for me.

In hexcells the real enjoyment of the game is the hand-crafted levels. Be they made by the developer or fanbase.

And once you have dug your way through those you have the procedurally generated levels that are decent entertainment. But never provide the same feeling of cleverness and satisfaction when you complete the puzzle.

This game has only generated content.

I don't like this for the same reason I don't like Tametsi - it's a where's waldo game. You have to look at every square and see which is the SINGLE one to uncover /mark.

Rinse / repeat.

It's okay, but I dislike it telling me when i mark a wrong mine.

The game has few simple rules:
Minesweeper: Non-mine tiles have a number that tell how many mines are adjacent to it. Clicking a tile reveals it. Clicking on a mine loses the game.
Mine Count: Mine count tells how many mines are in the field
No Guessing: You lose if you guess, each tile reveal must be a deduction that has 100% chance of being correct.
Beatable Levels: Every level is generated to be beatable without guessing, but mine locations are moved around to prove you could've lost when you do guess.
Uniqueness: You cannot use the above rule to "know" where mines are, as each level has multiple solutions until you reveal tile numbers.

One of the variants is called Liar. It adds a new rule:
Liar: Tile numbers are wrong by 1 value. Meaning that a "1" could be 0 OR 2. A "4" could be 3 OR 5.

This creates a bug in the "No Guessing" check within the game. No Guessing is well implemented rule, as it has been programmed with EVERY SINGLE deduction type in minesweeper...

Except for one. Liar creates a new deduction type when combined with Beatable Levels.

[?] are common thing in the game, they are revealed tiles that do not tell how many mines are next to them. Think of them as confirmed non-bombs.

[.] non-revealed tiles, click on them to reveal or mark as a bomb.

[x] is a marked bomb

See this example board:

2 mines remaining:
[x] [?] [?]
[.] [2] [?]
[.] [.] [?]
We only have one revealed liar number: "2", with a single mine next to it. This represents either 1 OR 3. We have 2 mines remaining, meaning that it must represent a 3.

This means that two of the empty spots must have the remaining bombs, but you cannot know which of the tree has them. This means you must guess, breaking Beatable Levels rule.

So this is an illegal board position. So what? Well, look at this board:

2 mines remaining:
[?] [?] [.] [?]
[x] [?] [1] [.]
[.] [2] [?] [?]
[.] [.] [?] [?]
As you can see, this is the same field as above, but with extra lines on the right and top.

So now we have two liar numbers: "2" and "1".
"1" can either be 0 OR 2.
If "1" is 2, then both the remaining mines are on the two empty spots and we have solved the board. Great!

But if "1" it is 0, then it has no mines next to it, and we get a same board state as on the first board. But this board state was illegal.

This means we only have only one option: The bombs must be above.

The issue?