AI need to chill the heck down with RPGs

[ForinBR]

Starting a campaign is painful as hell, because the AI seems to almost never miss an rpg shot across the map, obliterating any kind of light armor you have. Its just so dumb, 5 BTRs suppressing the enemy when all of a sudden an rpg from the other side of the map destroys it. Meanwhile i can barely hit anything with the RPG because it has an weird ass aim

[Nash_Bridges]

Greetings. You have to take ballistics into account when firing RPGs. As for your enemies being able to use it too far away - try reducing your sight radius. Overall I don't see anything implausible here. RPGs can quite effectively destroy such equipment in real life.

[Patrick]

gameplay > realism why should i buy a vehicle which costs 5 times more when i could just buy rpgs. because the vehicles doesnt stand a chance.
for real this game need some balancing.

[Johnman]

I think the main problems is the optics and AI.

I agree that the AI rarely misses with RPGS they are much better than they should be. Trouble also is that the super sophisticated billion dollar tank can't see as ell as it should be able to take out those squishies

[ForinBR]

Originally posted by Nash_Bridges:

Greetings. You have to take ballistics into account when firing RPGs. As for your enemies being able to use it too far away - try reducing your sight radius. Overall I don't see anything implausible here. RPGs can quite effectively destroy such equipment in real life.

Well just check what the players here commented. I don't disagree that the ballistics should be reallistic, my issue is that the iron sight on the RPG sucks ass, sometimes you aim perfectly at an enemy tank and the RPG just goes to the moon for no reason, it needs tweaking, perhaps adding an PGO-7 scope that works to with would help, idk.

[Urk_da_WAAAGH!]

If you can't barely hit anything that's on you, RPGs are good as they are now

[ForinBR]

Originally posted by Urk_da_WAAAGH!:

If you can't barely hit anything that's on you, RPGs are good as they are now

most of the times i can, but not like the AI, which seems to have godlike precision from the other side of the map

[Nash_Bridges]

Originally posted by Johnman:

I think the main problems is the optics and AI.

I agree that the AI rarely misses with RPGS they are much better than they should be. Trouble also is that the super sophisticated billion dollar tank can't see as ell as it should be able to take out those squishies

It seems to me that you set a small view range before starting the game.

[Bishop-Six]

I agree to both, RPG aim is fine for me when you are used to "undercut" in relative close distances.

Also i agree that enemy AI is super annoying with their laser-eyes-optics and 10 of 10 hits from 500 metres or more.

Its definitely more worth at the moment to spam RPGs than to build vehicles since those are magically spotted and hit by the AI all the time.

Sure, very cautious progressing with vehicles helps a lot, i desperately moving from trees to stones to trees with my expensive super tanks.

While the militia Rebel AI dude running around with his RPG having a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ good time.

[Mittens]

1 - I think RPG's are much more common early game as most factions have a good stock pile of them, but less common after many battles, when the weapons themselves, or perhaps their ammo, has been depleted.

2 - Lead vehicles with infantry. I love my little gun trucks, but I don't charge in with them. Use them from a decent distance behind your infantry screen to suppress and destroy enemy infantry. Same with tanks. If you charge with your tanks or gun trucks, you are going to eat a lot of RPG's. Sometimes if you want to stall the enemy for a few minutes to give your other troops time to position, that's fine, but otherwise, its a waste of vehicles.

I have found great success with gun trucks in winning battles, but you need to have normal infantry to screen and take urban areas.