Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
the game is a full game (unlike some devs who try to pass off their pre-pre-alpha tech demos as ea). lots to do. gets patched very quickly with balance fixes. yeah.
But the core mechanics are great and functional, it's just an issue of polish.
Is it worth it? Hard to say no, but if you have absolutely no tolerance for navigating around certain bugs then you should probably wait a bit.
Do keep in mind he's right:
Most people complaining are complaining about non-issues, pretending a hard game that takes thinking (imagine having to think in a strategy game) is somehow a bug, it's not, you're supposed to manage your noble's tasks to make things work, the game won't play itself for you.
It's odd how the people complaining there aren't too many slots for nobles are the same people complaining about having to do too much with them.
I think the prefab buildings hurt it. I don't get why my 'King' and 'Queen' live in separate houses. I'd rather build a house framework and furnish it, like you would with RimWorld - you create the walls and add furniture, lighting and decor, etc.
not ground breaking but neat.