Support for 144fps ?

[einBetra]

Is a support for 144 FPS planned, in 2024 a 60 FPS lock is already pretty hard :( ?

greetings Betra

[kongkim]

Yah same, are there a way to remove the FPS lock?

[Big McLargehuge]

Following for a fix as well - feels super stuttery on a 144hz panel

[Colonel_Black]

Some of you people must be high..
On FPS and TPS, I totally agree with 144hz and higher.
But on a game like this, going above 60 is simply stressing your GPU for absolutely no reason. Nothing will look clearer or faster going above 60 fps on this type of game, the animations aren't anything like a FPS/TPS.

[Colonel_Black]

İlk olarak Big McLargehuge tarafından gönderildi:

Following for a fix as well - feels super stuttery on a 144hz panel

I'm on a 144Hz monitor and it doesn't feel stuttery to me and I'm usually quite sensitive to that. Not sure what may be causing that for you

[piglet]

Please support 144 fps. With 60 fps lock and no goal to implement support for 144 or unlocked framerate I will probably refund the game. A pity for such otherwise nice looking game.

Will 144 fps be supported?

[kongkim]

İlk olarak Colonel_Black tarafından gönderildi:

Some of you people must be high..
On FPS and TPS, I totally agree with 144hz and higher.
But on a game like this, going above 60 is simply stressing your GPU for absolutely no reason. Nothing will look clearer or faster going above 60 fps on this type of game, the animations aren't anything like a FPS/TPS.

Nothing to do with that, if you normally use 144hz and your eyes are used it, you can clearly see/feel when you are only on 60hz.

[KingOneal1]

I too would like a higher refresh rate if possible.

[Poltergeist]

Ah, this explains why the camera zooming was so choppy when I played it. Super noticeable on my system.

[Ω]

İlk olarak kongkim tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak Colonel_Black tarafından gönderildi:

Some of you people must be high..
On FPS and TPS, I totally agree with 144hz and higher.
But on a game like this, going above 60 is simply stressing your GPU for absolutely no reason. Nothing will look clearer or faster going above 60 fps on this type of game, the animations aren't anything like a FPS/TPS.

Nothing to do with that, if you normally use 144hz and your eyes are used it, you can clearly see/feel when you are only on 60hz.

Exactly this.

[Andrius227]

İlk olarak Colonel_Black tarafından gönderildi:

Some of you people must be high..
On FPS and TPS, I totally agree with 144hz and higher.
But on a game like this, going above 60 is simply stressing your GPU for absolutely no reason. Nothing will look clearer or faster going above 60 fps on this type of game, the animations aren't anything like a FPS/TPS.

You don’t know what you are talking about. Even moving the mouse cursor on the desktop feels much smoother at 144fps. And in games with a top town view it’s particularly noticeable when panning the camera.

And a game with simple graphics like this is definitely not going to cause much stress on gpu.

[Minister van Buitenlandse Smaken]

I just refunded the game because of this reason. I am using a 170hz monitor so being locked to 60fps feels very jarring.

To people who think this is snobbish: remember when 30fps games used to feel fine until you got your first PC that ran games at 60fps? Then tried going back 30 fps?

Same thing applies here

[Andrius227]

İlk olarak Minister van Buitenlandse Smaken tarafından gönderildi:

I just refunded the game because of this reason. I am using a 170hz monitor so being locked to 60fps feels very jarring.

To people who think this is snobbish: remember when 30fps games used to feel fine until you got your first PC that ran games at 60fps? Then tried going back 30 fps?

Same thing applies here

Now that is a bit harsh. This game is in early access so it will likely get high refresh rates.

While i prefer 144hz, i can still tolarate 60hz if the game is good.

[VoiD]

I have a 144hz monitor, honestly, I couldn't tell the difference over 60 most/all of the time.

Anything below 60 starts looking like a slideshow

[DAOWAce]

Dev response here from a year ago: https://steamcommunity.com/app/1857090/discussions/0/6664812048269057852/

Doesn't make any sense.

Still locked for the official release. Config file setting still non-functional. (also still called "Strategy" in %localappdata%, really should've been named Norland on EA release)

I can tolerate 60FPS for games like this after a while of running it, but even tabbing out to Windows for a bit and tabbing back in is so jarring. "Oh god forgot it was 60FPS" type exclamation.

And as stated in my post in the other thread, there's no way to edit the game logic because of yoyo compiler.

Only the developer can change this.

[Minister van Buitenlandse Smaken]

İlk olarak Andrius227 tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak Minister van Buitenlandse Smaken tarafından gönderildi:

I just refunded the game because of this reason. I am using a 170hz monitor so being locked to 60fps feels very jarring.

To people who think this is snobbish: remember when 30fps games used to feel fine until you got your first PC that ran games at 60fps? Then tried going back 30 fps?

Same thing applies here

Now that is a bit harsh. This game is in early access so it will likely get high refresh rates.

While i prefer 144hz, i can still tolarate 60hz if the game is good.

Not trying to be harsh, I just find it the step from 170 to 60hz to be really jarring. I personally would rather use my money to buy a game that doesn´t have this issue and come back later when my gripes with it are fixed. It´s just personal preference.