Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Hard to know, First you need to find where is the drop. Because you have a 7800x3D and it will capable to run at 90 fps (I had tested) I supposed that is on GPU side.
The 4090 don't have enough headroom to run this game on (Ultra: 2688x2784) with the presets on the guide, without cut the FOV.
The guide target for 80 fps, runs on limit in hard performance stages (ex. Japan in rain at night). In light stages stays about 85% of GPU usage.
For 90 fps or don't cut the FOV, I suggest to lower the preset on this sequence:
Shadow - Medium
Track - Low
Trees - Medium
Ground Cover - Low
Dynamic Objects - HIgh (Medium create too many POP-IN in open stages)
Shader - High \ Medium
And for last (free about 15 a 20% of performance)
PostProcessing - Ultra Low (because the LOW, or MEDIUM runs worse than HIGH)
But personally I prefer to cut the FOV, or run in 80 (mainly the vertical FOV - 65 \ 70, that don't really affect the experience) than reduce the quality presets because the game looks ugly without Shader in Ultra and PostProcessing in High...
Thanks, I'm using an Index so I don't think I can target 80fps and I was really trying to get away without adjusting the FOV but maybe it's worth a try if the benefit outweights the downside. Thanks again for the info.
So if you set your index to 144hz, you could then target 72fps
That is what i do with my Q3 because the game feels very bad even with a consistent 90 fps.
Solution for me was to stick my q3 to 120hz mode and now i have a much smoother feeling and looking 60 fps.
It is strange because both DR2 VR and EA WRC VR feel loke a choppy mess at lower hz rates. For DR2 it was the low framerate of the steering wheel and windshield wipers that make the game feel choppy at a cinsistent VR framerate.
EA WRC has vastly improved in this department but 60 fps ratio is needed for some reason.
Now it is smooth like butter at 60 reprojected into 120. Much smoother then a 72,80, or 90 framerate with asw on or off
I had tried.. But ASW in this game create a lot of input lag... I can't enjoy.
Normally i run things at 90 or 120 but more demanding games i tend to leverage the higher refresh rate and reprojection tech rather than turn down graphics settings.
Games like No Mans Sky VR and this game here really benefit from it in my opinion. It is the only way i can get the steering wheel animation to look smooth.
I tried running EA WRC at the native 72,80, 90hz rates, i turn down a lot of settings to make sure i can hold the desired framerate and it just feels horrible, the steering wheel animation and things flying by while driving just look so choppy.
Other sims are fine at lower refresh rates. AMS2, AC, ACC. I don't need to use ASW with those and it all looks nice and smooth.
It is something in the design of both Dirt Rally and EA WRC. I don't see it mentioned very often so maybe it is something on my end.
I think you're running into this
"IMPORTANT - Any adjust include in [SystemSettings] create the right eye black frame. So if you have this glitch remove all the codes there."
I don't think you will get any improvement.. =\ . The 7800x3D is strong enough to run this game at 120 fps without get 100% on the render cores.
Maybe something with the microsutters? Hard to say... More easily get more problems, with newest BIOS, bugs, lack of adjustments on launch...
But let's get optmistic, will be better!
This guide is very old and not updated anymore. I had see and tested it in the past.
Some commands are useful, but some of them, now create more problems than solutions.