So, Veilguard is good Because of "DEI".......

[giuseppe.venti]

And my question is, what does "DEI" have to do with a game being good?
Why should that be a criteria to take into account to define if a game is good?

It's actually a bad idea,

A game should not be politicized, because there will always be people who will be from one party or another, just as there are Biden fans and Trump fans,

So my question is, would it be okay for a game to be used to promote Trump? or to promote Biden?

Video game developers should stay away from these issues, and focus on creating good games, with good stories, good game play, good characters, and good graphics.

These are the criteria that define a good game, If you don't have that you don't have a good game, and if you politicize a game with gender ideology or any other kind of political agenda, the criteria that really matters are distorted.

So to those who claim victory because Veilguard is inclusive, you are absolutely right, claim victory because it is inclusive but not because it is a good game, in addition to the fact that social values ​​have degraded to the point of putting this agenda in all sectors of society.

[DeJaVuRick]

''Agenda'' lol
You been watching Youtube videos again?

[giuseppe.venti]

Originally posted by DeJaVuRick:

''Agenda'' lol
You been watching Youtube videos again?

Well, english is not my main language, so for me the important thing is not if I have grammatical errors, the important thing is if the message is true, call it what you want, ideology, lgbt agenda, Trump or Biden, right or left.

[Foxrun]

US politics aren’t featured in the game. People are extremely intolerant when online because of minimum consequences.

[Pandasaur]

Art is political. Life is political. Our civilization is political. You can't ignore politics when your game has any semblance, at all, to human civilization. Grow up, learn to filter fiction and themes, or play something else.

[DeJaVuRick]

Originally posted by Pandasaur:

Art is political. Life is political. Our civilization is political. You can't ignore politics when your game has any semblance, at all, to human civilization. Grow up, learn to filter fiction and themes, or play something else.

This

[Rhann]

Most players just want good game play, characters and story, and how other people have options they like have zero impact in their game session.

Are there LBTQ characters in the game? I don't care, they exist in real life, would be odd to think they wouldn't exist in other worlds.

You could have gay romances in DA1 and ME1, men just wasn't so weak back then that they got too scared to play the game.

If you don't want to enjoy a game because you are afraid of the content, that is fine, but is so peculiar that your little loud group think that it has any impact on sane people. So weird.

[GolfLover420]

Developer put LGTQ+ tag on purpose if you don't liking LGTQ+ maybe game is not for you!

[giuseppe.venti]

Originally posted by Pandasaur:

Art is political. Life is political. Our civilization is political. You can't ignore politics when your game has any semblance, at all, to human civilization. Grow up, learn to filter fiction and themes, or play something else.

Games are not about politics, at least not good onces, I dont see any game promoting Biden or Trump.

[Foxrun]

Originally posted by giuseppe.venti:

Originally posted by Pandasaur:

Art is political. Life is political. Our civilization is political. You can't ignore politics when your game has any semblance, at all, to human civilization. Grow up, learn to filter fiction and themes, or play something else.

Games are not about politics, at least not good onces.

Kid, this game isn’t about politics. It sounds like you’re just intolerant.

[giuseppe.venti]

Originally posted by Q4P:

Developer put LGTQ+ tag on purpose if you don't liking LGTQ+ maybe game is not for you!

Fair enough, tell that too to budwiser when it pushed the LGBTQ agenda and lost millions, or to concord when it shut down the server after 14 days, should I keep giving you examples?

[Valkyria]

It makes some of us happy to be included, like in general I've always been more eager to play a video game that has character creation and I like to make myself in video games.

So if a video game has a male only character or doesn't allow character creation I'll be less excited, I'd imagine this extends to people that are transgender and it makes them happier.

I felt this way with Battlefield 5 having female troops, as it allowed me to unlock and enjoy customization. Were as if it was male only, I'd not really be into the customization or enjoy anything I unlocked. With Veilguard I'd simply buy it due to the character creator, even if It wasn't a Dragon Age game or good. I'd enjoy just that aspect of the game.

[giuseppe.venti]

Originally posted by Foxrun:

Originally posted by giuseppe.venti:

Games are not about politics, at least not good onces.

Kid, this game isn’t about politics. It sounds like you’re just intolerant.

I'm not, yet what does tolerance have to do with creating a good game? and if you want to create a good game you can't put those elements in the game, and Im not a Kid.

[Mysti_Fogg]

If you want non-DEI games, you have to play games with no characters.

Let me Illustrate:

Scenario 1:
You play as a floor washer. You are a white man and your job is to wash floors for the white man who is your boss. These are the only two characters in the game.

Politics: So do only white men exist in this world? Why are both the characters white, if you're only going to have two of them, why not at least make them different colors to help differentiate them? Or do non-white people not deserve to be in games. Are there no women in this world? Are women not allowed to work outside the home?

Scenario 2: You play as a white man washing floors for a black woman.

Politics: Of course the white man is doing labor for the DEI overlord black woman.

Scenario 3) You play as a black woman washing floors for a white man

Politics: And of course they make the black woman do all the work. She's still on her knees despite 1862 setting her free. That's how people like to draw her.

Scenario 4) You play a black man working for a white woman.

Politics: See above.

Scenario 5: you play as a black woman working for another black woman

Politics: So do only black women exist in this world? If you're going to only have two of them, why not make one white? Is this oppression of white people? Or white men, why are there no men in this game?

Etc.

Every scenario has political implications once you put people into it, even if they don't speak it, they reinforce a world view.

[lefty1117]

The biggest disappointment to me about all this woke/DEI stuff going on is how weak and sensitive it turns out my fellow white men are these days. Way too sensitive and worried about what a focus on minorities and others means for their own status in life. After centuries of being the dominant force in global politics. I thought we were stronger and more self assured. We really messed up the kids I guess.

[Diabolical Taco]

Idk, I was thinking of pulling the trigger on this despite my reservations, but I've seen enough dialogue snippets to make me question that choice. There's so much in-your-face messaging that I'm not sure I want to deal with it. The writers either forgot, or didn't know in the first place, one of the oldest rules of writing: don't write it if it doesn't need to be there or else you're highlighting the language and it breaks immersion.

Less is more. Understating your intentions is more effective than overstating them, and they're breaking these rules left and right. But I have to admit the combat looks fun.