Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This new stuff isn't formulated well, and this is from someone who looked forward to the future with glee, and had high hopes all these years. I'm not 'some hater' I'm genuinely upset that there is less complexity in modern games than games from 10, 15, and 20 years ago yes. Because that is REGRESSIVE by nature.
also the necromancer thing doesnt surprise me. games always snub necromancy. always.
The worst thing is no blood magic, it's literally an iconic part of the series!