Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Game looks phenomenal.
I think the game looks great.
Because it looks cartoonish and the characters were all cursed with Big-Head mode for some reason.
"Whining"?
This is what is wrong with the leftitsts. They simply cant comprehend that people have opinions. Its not whining to dislike the artstyle, its owning an opinion that the artstyle, especially the god-awful character design, is not pleasing to their eyes.
Which one? The art-style of Origins, or the completely different one of DA2? Or Inquisition's?
Inquisition went so far as to have more colors than brown, in fact.
Or the shiny glowies. Or the general design of the UI/UX.
Or about the changed models for certain things (Qunari, Darkspawn, etc.)
Or about the lack of functional sliders during creation, and the weird facial structures, head proportions, etc.
As noted, some of the aspects are still great (hair, environments, etc.). I don't even mind that they tried a stylized approach. To me, it just doesn't deliver or isn't always consistent with what's already been established as being 'Dragon Age.'