Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
As Mounting Evidence Points To Poor Sales, BioWare Partners With NVIDIA To Give ‘Dragon Age: The Veilguard’ Away For Free[thatparkplace.com]
The writing is on the wall, just look at the track record of the latest heavily DEI infused titles.
Is there even any gameplay?
It's just one long winded trans indoctrination
All the dialogue options are 95% wasted on ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥
Well, there's saying something, and doing the work to model it out. Also, "going gangbusters" is a bit outside the model.
And the retailer holdback is not relevant to the number of units sold, only for calculating EA revenue and profit. I talk a little about that in an earlier post, but since we don't really know the budget, I did not attempt to model profit.
Respectfully, while the data is indeed fuzzy, my analysis was data driven, and all of my data you can verify yourself (well, for some you would need to pay Gamalytic $25).
That Park Place, on the other hand, just threw some words at wall and hit submit. "A retail insider" versus publicly verifiable bestseller lists. I know which one I put more credence in. But to be fair, the Gamer article that claimed Veilguard was selling amazingly well was about equally worthless in terms of analysis.
I addressed some of this above:
As far as availability on EA Play Pro, this honestly is just extra revenue for EA. My modeling was based on Steam performance to date, which is what it is despite the fact that EA Play Pro is a good option.
The same is true for things like offering Veilguard for "free" by bundling with GeForce Now or GPUs. Developers have been making these deals forever, and they do so for a piece of the revenue on the bundled item. Now obviously Nvidia won't pay EA $60 a pop, but whatever they are getting is yet more extra revenue for EA that is in addition to what the model would predict.
They are forced to have a year per year perspective, so dev costs in previous years haven't link with estimated revenue com that is always per year. A perfect example is Ubisoft that did huge sells but had too many delayed projects hence their annual income got endangered.
For EA their huge sells are out of Steam, so you can't say much on EA from Steam numbers (check top sell list of 2023, then the EA games in Steam and you'll see gigantic differences).
Anyway there's no Steam numbers yet for DAtV.
COUNTERPOINT: