Angryjoe just released his Veilguard review and gave it a 3/10

[Geek Ultra]

do you guys agree?

[gehenna]

Originalmente postado por Gibbs:

Not sure people in this thread understand that on a scale from 1-10, 5 is the middle. If someone dislikes a game, they'll rate it below that. 3/10 seems perfectly in line with his criticisms of the game.

5 is actually not the middle. The mid point is 5.5. There are 10 whole numbers which is an even amount, so that automatically means that the middle is between two whole numbers

[RJDio]

I would give 2/10 as an old fan of the series and a very old Bioware fan, they deserve 1 point for a good technical part

[🆂🅼🅾🅺🅴🆂]

Forced inclusion, Poor dialog, Uncompelling story, Boring combat, Zero gore or threatening appearance of any mob. Terrible generic level design. Zero compelling villains. Horrible, child like, sexual banter. Why would a grown man give this anything other then a 3/10. He is completely correct.

[IWWR]

I agree with that rating

[Night Knight]

just finished watching it. honestly, id say its a 4 maybe 5/10. he has good reasons for giving it that score though. bioware really dropped the ball on this one. the handful of people who like it will like it. i have it for ps5 and i just cant bring myself to keep playing it.

[Drake Ravenwolf]

I wonder why they didn't give critical reviewers like him a review copy... weird...
But ya I agree with all his critiques; this has damaged the brand and... oh joy all the writers from Veilguard are now working on Mass Effect >.>

[laZydutcHguy]

agree, stopt playing after 6 hours i don,t need that weird stuff in the game handfisted in my head, no options in dialog all happy no disscusions , gotta say i buy dragon age origins after sounds crazy but that is what veilgaurd put me to. and first 20 minutes fully engaged. good luck with veilgaurd, in 20 year of gaming what is this...........

[EvelynWarden]

I wouldn't agree with the 3/10 (actually just watched the video and had a good laugh) - it's better than a 3, but sentimentally I didn't love it more than a 3. Whatever or whoever this game was made for, it wasn't for me, a 15 year fan. The writing was painful. That said, the channel does entertaining reviews, not serious ones, and shouldn't be taken very seriously.

[Zelmor]

A 3 is too high.

[The Beemaster™]

Agreed, okayish Game but worst Dragon Age title.
The writing is Garbo...
Like for a kids book... But from a pedo...

[Xextreem]

Angry Joe lost his touch of games a very very long time ago. I can't remember any good reviews for I think 5 years now. He is not on point and is more in fanboy mode, which is too bad. Still, some points agree this game is nowhere good. It's just mid. Perhaps lower. But depends on what you can handle and what not.

[TheAlliedGhost]

Joe's rating is correct. This game is Horrible. If anyone is looking to the forums to see if you should get this game. DO NOT BUY IT. Its a terrible game. I cant even finish it.

[Pogey-Bait]

Originalmente postado por EvelynWarden:

I wouldn't agree with the 3/10 (actually just watched the video and had a good laugh) - it's better than a 3, but sentimentally I didn't love it more than a 3. Whatever or whoever this game was made for, it wasn't for me, a 15 year fan. The writing was painful. That said, the channel does entertaining reviews, not serious ones, and shouldn't be taken very seriously.

Just because a critic may use humor in their review doesn't make it un-serious.

[OOFleming]

Opinions are like this:

You have a bum, I have a bum, my bum is different to your bum but the one thing they do have in common is they will both cause a stink people won't like

[Festus]

I started a new thread earlier today pointing out that the reviews have flipped from 300 mixed to 25k mostly positive in a week and a steam moderator censored my post. Very Strange......