Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I just said this in another thread but worth mentioning here. I scrolled through the Steam reviews for 2 minutes and they are almost all thumbs down. Just a wall of red downturned thumbs with an occasional blue one. There's no way that score they are showing isn't fixed.
If I may speak for the long standing Dragon Age fans. Its not even the Wokism in the game..
They Ruined what Dragon Age is. DAV removed Every single Important Core Aspect of what made Dragon Age a Dragon Age game. Literally not 1 core aspect remains in the game. Which of itself ruins the game..
Its literally just a 2bit Generic ass RPG 101 that bears the Dragon Age name.. Not to mention the changes to Creatures.
Pride Demons literally look like a Discounter Magic the Gathering Monster now... Like wtf? they looked amazing before.. The new looks for Darkspawn also suck.. I mix them up with Qunari all the damn time.
Fact is, Wokeism in the game is not the reason it failed. It is a part, but I think the things I mentioned far outweigh the Wokeness in the Game. By leaps and Bounds.
People use "objectively" way too freely. Some people consider Origins the best DA game, yeah, that doesn't make it true though. Kinda hard to claim one entry to the entire franchise is the best when the franchise in question changes with each new game.
You're free to like what you like, I'm not going to argue with you which DA game is the best because that varies depending on the person.
What's the user score on Metacritic? Hint, extremely low. And how many "positive" Steam reviews were negative the entire way but then have a thumbs up? Hmm...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUZoJBavTCI
>20K and dropping after only 2 weeks
NGMI
IGN has posted an updated review that negates their positive shill review.
Player numbers could not even beat the BETA for another game in Veilguards opening week and is now trending at less than half of the players online.
And we have seen numerous reports of returns of the game to the point even Game Stop slashed its buy back price during the games first week.
This is anything but a Commercial success... This is truly a disaster for Bioware to the point its even shaken development of other games...
Why mention Metacritic as if it's a reliable source? You don't even have to prove you own the product in question that you're leaving a review for. I could go leave a review saying RDR2 has the worst story ever despite me not owning the game and never playing it.
Personally I judge games myself, but if I were to take reviews into consideration it'd be on gaming platforms like Steam where only users that own the game can leave reviews and you can see their playtime at the time of the review.
If you read a lot of negative reviews for Veilguard on Metacritic, most of them is just the typical "game bad" not constructive criticism. Likely people that don't own the game.
The Last of Us 2 was also another example of people not owning the game but review bombing it on Metacritic.
You can go by the first 4 reviews if you want, but for others reading reviews to see whether the game is actually decent or not instead of using it to trash the game, they could look at some of the more constructive reviews, both positive and negative.