Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Well, you could decide NOT to do Dory's personal quest and it made absolutely no difference. If you ignore the personal quests in DAV it has consequences, just like in ME2, on which the paradigm is modeled.
But to focus on Dory for a moment, what I found annoying about his personal quest was not that he was gay or even that it was about his daddy issues. It was that your choices as the Inquisitor were (A) support Dory and tell him to walk away, or (B) support Dory and tell him to hang in.
What's missing? An option--which I would have chosen--to tell him to man up and accede to his father's dynastic wishes while keeping his boyfriend on the side.
The lore makes it perfectly clear that (1) homosexuality in Thedas is tolerated as long as you keep it behind closed doors and don't frighten the horses, and (2) pretty much anyone in a position like Dorian gets to have something on the side.
I would even be OK with that option carrying the risk--even the certainty--that Dory would flounce out never to be seen again (like Sera does if you don't coddle HER).
But, nope--even then the agenda was in play. Sadly.
I dont know whats the problem with adding an option to have a trans/non binary character.
Or having a sexually colourful companion to match that character.
People are just stupid as always xD
It's especially irritating when Taash spends most of the game shouting "you don't get to decide who I am" before belittling Emmrich for his occupation and not backing down. My boy didn't deserve that disrespect.
"I doubt that the developers foresaw that Taash's identity issues would cause such an uproar."
They absolutely did, and didn't give one iota, because that's who Bioware is. This is Bioware being true to themselves, the way they should be. Just like Taash needs to be, her character and story line are perfect for it. All of this follows in the trend of not just Bioware games and the Bioware crew, but especially Dragon Age itself. I can't be the only one who's read about the creators of the series and why LGBTQ issues are important to them, since many were themselves LGBTQ. They have continually strived to be more and more inclusive.
To anyone it bothers: 1, I'm glad it does and 2, if you don't like it, go play something else. Bioware will have plenty of sales without you, more than it they had not included it.
I guess the gender convo with mum went about as well as depicted in the game?
What delusional world are you in? EA announced the game flopped. They empirically are not getting plenty of sales. Game went on 40% off a few days after EA admitted it isn't selling.
Agreed. There are many problems with Veilguard. The characters not all being straight white men or "sexy" straight white women and not letting you tell the LGBT to go to hell aren't any of those problems.