Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You haven't been paying attention. Replay the prologue. There is a faction that is all about fighting slavery.
Apparently this one gets darker later on but it definitely seems to take its time from what I've seen on streams.
They are fighting it behind the scenes, though I recall that the slavery theme as a whole thing was extremely important for the lore. And that was important even back when games took place, not in the literal center of slavery (Tevinter). And another important thing that's missing is elven slave districts and their reaction to the return of their gods.
Yeah, I probably phrased it badly. There are definitely mentions, but this whole theme seems to me to be one of extreme importance for the lore, but playing the game makes me feel like writers try to ignore it on purpose.
There's also some barely mentioned lore in the game which implies Tevinter basically partially reformed in the interrim between DA:I and Veilguard (which is mostly due to effects from DA2 and Inquisitor where Tevinter's most powerful slave movements get mauled trying to fight Hawke/Inquisitor).
It's not particularly clearly explained, but it is raised a couple of times in dialogue. It's also very wishy washy, I don't know why they didn't just do the obvious thing of have Tevinter be recovering from a civil war with a partial improvement of slavery conditions if they wanted to do it as they did, but hey, what do I know.
I agree with that yep, I find it bizarre that they go to such excessive effort to avoid discussing what could have been interesting components - AND it doesn't even need to go against their lighter tones - Rook could smash some remnants of the old slave trade for a side story, defend an elfanage (spelling? lol) from a Venatori attack, etc... without needing to break from the current tone of the story. Hell, with how heroic Rook is objectively meant to be, it would be ENTIRELY within the character to do exactly this.
Thank you for explaining this lore moments. That was a part of some headcanon I had, but I really wish writers would care more about the theme that was crucial in previous games