IGN gave this game 5/10

[Breeding Medicine]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Rh1CVxdis

the same people who gave Skull and Bones 7/10

[ThatZenoGuy]

Sparhawk122님이 먼저 게시:

I think IGN have a point. This game can be extremely tough. And the missions require you to read a guide to get through them to a satisfactory standard and allow you to have enough resources and troops to finish the next mission.

Also be aware this IGN review was done prior to the newest patch which made big sweeping balance changes and fixed ultrawide support.

Factor onto this the atrocious PC performance. I can see how IGN gave it a 5/10.

The game hardly needs a guide at all, it just needs a few saves per mission which is what ALL RTS GAMES required in the past.

IGN gives CoD 9/10 every year, their reviews are little more than paid shills.

[XLLDARKCRISIS]

ThatZenoGuy님이 먼저 게시:

Sparhawk122님이 먼저 게시:

I think IGN have a point. This game can be extremely tough. And the missions require you to read a guide to get through them to a satisfactory standard and allow you to have enough resources and troops to finish the next mission.

Also be aware this IGN review was done prior to the newest patch which made big sweeping balance changes and fixed ultrawide support.

Factor onto this the atrocious PC performance. I can see how IGN gave it a 5/10.

The game hardly needs a guide at all, it just needs a few saves per mission which is what ALL RTS GAMES required in the past.

IGN gives CoD 9/10 every year, their reviews are little more than paid shills.

don't forget IGN were the ones constantly promoting The Day Before lol

[ThatZenoGuy]

XLLDARKCRISIS님이 먼저 게시:

don't forget IGN were the ones constantly promoting The Day Before lol

IGN and 99% of gaming journalism should be redefined as a synonym of 'clown'.

[dna]

Why EXACTLY does IGN has such a buzz?
It is kinda expected that gaming journalists can hardly find their ass with both hands, let alone operate a gamepad properly, but IGN is a meme since how many years exactly ?
Idk if they excel in journalism but the few articles I read usually came down to opinion pieces with very... solidified opinions (from basement dwelling thirty-somethings, if I want to be mean)

[Crystal meth enthusiast]

I don't need IGN to give it 5/10.

[ThatZenoGuy]

dna님이 먼저 게시:

Why EXACTLY does IGN has such a buzz?
It is kinda expected that gaming journalists can hardly find their ass with both hands, let alone operate a gamepad properly, but IGN is a meme since how many years exactly ?
Idk if they excel in journalism but the few articles I read usually came down to opinion pieces with very... solidified opinions (from basement dwelling thirty-somethings, if I want to be mean)

To be clear, almost all gaming journalists are merely paid shills. They give games low scores unless they're bribed into advertising the game.

IGN is simply a very infamous one, they give 9/10 scores to terrible games because they get paid to do it, then they give sub 5/10 scores for actual good games who cannot afford the bribe.

[Oxyphill]

Despite all hardships ans questionable mechanics, the game provided me a very enjoyable week of playing. 8/10 All depends on personal preferences. Sometimes I think the modern player is very picky.

[Crystal meth enthusiast]

Sparhawk122님이 먼저 게시:

I think IGN have a point. This game can be extremely tough. And the missions require you to read a guide to get through them to a satisfactory standard and allow you to have enough resources and troops to finish the next mission.

Also be aware this IGN review was done prior to the newest patch which made big sweeping balance changes and fixed ultrawide support.

Factor onto this the atrocious PC performance. I can see how IGN gave it a 5/10.

Yes, i would give it 5/10 too.
But with patches it solid 5.9/10.

[ThatZenoGuy]

Crystal meth enthusiast님이 먼저 게시:

Sparhawk122님이 먼저 게시:

I think IGN have a point. This game can be extremely tough. And the missions require you to read a guide to get through them to a satisfactory standard and allow you to have enough resources and troops to finish the next mission.

Also be aware this IGN review was done prior to the newest patch which made big sweeping balance changes and fixed ultrawide support.

Factor onto this the atrocious PC performance. I can see how IGN gave it a 5/10.

Yes, i would give it 5/10 too.
But with patches it solid 5.9/10.

Its literally one of the better RTS games made in the last 20 years lmao. At minimum its a 7/10.

[Crystal meth enthusiast]

ThatZenoGuy님이 먼저 게시:

Crystal meth enthusiast님이 먼저 게시:

Yes, i would give it 5/10 too.
But with patches it solid 5.9/10.

Its literally one of the better RTS games made in the last 20 years lmao. At minimum its a 7/10.

Didn't noticed over grinding final mission in 10 FPS. Oh wait, ALL save crash final mission. So just like Oklahoma i must complete it in 1 go.
4/10, too late for refund.

[Haks]

potato님이 먼저 게시:

yea well it's ign, their opinion is worth about as much as the human waste

Полностью согласен