and

[evilestkhan]

how is it had my eye on this for awhile..1

length tec tree etc..

just finished of troopers and aliens DD so looking for another RTS.

any info welcomed.

[Starlight]

You can compare it with Starship Troopers. You don´t build Units, you take them from mission to mission. It´s also quit complex, the troops have ammo and armored units need also fuel. No fuel,no driving. No ammo, no shooting. You sometimes have to abandon vehicles to get a fuel transport, drive it to your vehicles and refuel them. Each loss counts this game. No base building. After Mission 3 you get a Overworld map, where you choose your next course of action.

[evilestkhan]

Originally posted by Starlight:

You can compare it with Starship Troopers. You don´t build Units, you take them from mission to mission. It´s also quit complex, the troops have ammo and armored units need also fuel. No fuel,no driving. No ammo, no shooting. You sometimes have to abandon vehicles to get a fuel transport, drive it to your vehicles and refuel them. Each loss counts this game. No base building. After Mission 3 you get a Overworld map, where you choose your next course of action.

TY think I'll get it next weekend back to work tomorrow but next weekend off for 4 days...

[zpc]

It contains of ~14 maps with raising difficulty. Without meta-gaming knowledge missions take 2-6 hours to complete. (depending on play style and difficulty settings of course - this estimate was given for medium difficulty and overall cautious approach with a few high risk charges on occasion to speed things up).

Skirmish is only barebones at the moment (4 maps, 3 "capture the flag" and 1 defend). But devs are committed to work on that (including multiplayer, which is of less interest to me)

[Big McLargehuge]

it runs like garbage compared to all your listed titles; this game only uses one cpu core - there is no work around

[evilestkhan]

Originally posted by Big McLargeHuge:

it runs like garbage compared to all your listed titles; this game only uses one cpu core - there is no work around

I'll wait then no rush

[zpc]

Originally posted by Big McLargeHuge:

it runs like garbage compared to all your listed titles; this game only uses one cpu core - there is no work around

Just to give the OP a different perspective - runs awesome on my 6 year old i7 9700k, playing in 4K UHD. The game needs a strong single core processor. A 10-12 year old i5 or amd might not cut it. (those are outdated anyway no matter what)

[evilestkhan]

Bought it give it a try just qued red dragon it updating and Bulders gate are updating... great timing.

[Fireball]

Best play it like commandos/sudden strike and not so much like CnC. Also feel ready to repeat the first 2-5 missions on strategy map. You will have to learn and adapt to the supply system.

[evilestkhan]

Originally posted by Fireball:

Best play it like commandos/sudden strike and not so much like CnC. Also feel ready to repeat the first 2-5 missions on strategy map. You will have to learn and adapt to the supply system.

2 great games you mention... don't play it like dawn of war?

[Darth Glorious]

This game uses the same engine of Men of War

[ShadowLL]

Originally posted by Darth Glorious:

This game uses the same engine of Men of War

wait rly?
how did they managed to get such poor performance while having game looking WORSE than those 10+yo Men of War series?
I've got like up to hundred units in MoW 2 on the battlefield fighting on the screen and got no lags on my old 960gt while this abomination cant be handled by 3070ti + 3700ti

[Fireball]

Originally posted by evilestkhan:

Originally posted by Fireball:

Best play it like commandos/sudden strike and not so much like CnC. Also feel ready to repeat the first 2-5 missions on strategy map. You will have to learn and adapt to the supply system.

2 great games you mention... don't play it like dawn of war?

Also don't play like dawn of war, correct.

[evilestkhan]

Originally posted by Fireball:

Originally posted by evilestkhan:

2 great games you mention... don't play it like dawn of war?

Also don't play like dawn of war, correct.

agreed I'll work it out..

Pleasure to meet you all.

[Big McLargehuge]

Originally posted by zpc:

Originally posted by Big McLargeHuge:

it runs like garbage compared to all your listed titles; this game only uses one cpu core - there is no work around

Just to give the OP a different perspective - runs awesome on my 6 year old i7 9700k, playing in 4K UHD. The game needs a strong single core processor. A 10-12 year old i5 or amd might not cut it. (those are outdated anyway no matter what)

Hmm, interesting.

Can i ask what kind of frames are you pulling with that?

I'm running a 9900k and can't keep a stable 60 @ 1440p w. any graphic preset.. Its more commonly 45ish when the shooting starts.

Our processors should be extremely similar for single core performance from what im seeing.

(rest of specs: 7900 XTX gpu + 32gb ram + installed on m.2 drive)

[Deathstroke72]

Originally posted by Big McLargeHuge:

Originally posted by zpc:

Just to give the OP a different perspective - runs awesome on my 6 year old i7 9700k, playing in 4K UHD. The game needs a strong single core processor. A 10-12 year old i5 or amd might not cut it. (those are outdated anyway no matter what)

Hmm, interesting.

Can i ask what kind of frames are you pulling with that?

I'm running a 9900k and can't keep a stable 60 @ 1440p w. any graphic preset.. Its more commonly 45ish when the shooting starts.

Our processors should be extremely similar for single core performance from what im seeing.

(rest of specs: 7900 XTX gpu + 32gb ram + installed on m.2 drive)

I'm not sure what he was talking about, but I'm running on i7 12700KF, 3070, with 32 GB of RAM. The game has dropped as low as 20 fps on big levels like Oklahoma. Playing at 1440p like you.