安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Dark Fate has a bad story, bad characters and destroys the excellent story of Terminator 1 and 2 further.
You should have taken Terminator: Resistance from your fellow designers at Teyon as an example.
They wisely chose to base their game only on Terminator 1 and 2, and were rewarded by the fans with sales a lot higher than expected and a very high Steam rating.
You might have set yourselves up to failure or at least to very limited success, as opposed if you had chosen only the Future War scenario from T1 and 2.
There is virtually noone who prefers the Future War scenario from Dark Fate over the one of the first two beloved movies. You rejected a money machine and chose a failed setting.
Setting it within that version was a big mistake IMO. This doesn't look like anything related to Terminator.
As bad as the film was, I'm willing to differentiate this game from that film so long as said game is "good" given how little we even know of Dark Fate's new future so it's more on the devs to get creative about it.
You just made this up, it is highly unlikely the studio tried to meddle in this in any way. More likely Slitherine or Cats Who Play or both thought this was a good idea.
You mean like Cats Who Play who have one game that people remember?
You can try to make gold out of crap, or you can use gold ore.
With this game the former is the case. The setting is clearly inferior to T1 and 2 and clearly less attractive to customers. It seems the companies involved are not interested in making money, but in something else.
At the end of the day it's a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ RTS. Would I prefer a classic Terminator aesthetic look to this game? Yes. At the same time, I'm also willing to not give a flying ♥♥♥♥ since the best games of this genre all come between the 90s to mid 2000s. Gameplay is paramount to this genre at the end of the day and beyond unit visibility, visuals don't particularly matter much besides first impressions.
This game coming out more than two years, perhaps three years after the movie indicates that this deal was made with the failure of Dark Fate already known. It was a stupid deal.
So you admit that the setting is inferior? Fine.
It's also ok to admit that you are willing to accept this inferiority.
Just don't try to tell other players that this is ok and they should accept it, too. It is not and it is absolutely correct to call out nonsensical decisions of companies that result in inferior products, especially because they expect us as potential customers to give them money for this.
Same feelings here.
When someone on a forum just mentioned this project to me, in the recent past I had made it clear that I am a fan of Terminator Resistance, I immediately wanted to check out this project as it could be interesting.
I was thinking that perhaps even Teyon was making this.
Then I saw the name, and all my interest immediately disappeared. Especially after I saw the ingame 'machine' units.
Really disappointing, but I think Terminator fans and people who would like to see games based on favorite movies are used to this by now.
Good question. I can only think of the reason Cyber Moduled also brought up; because it is the most recent released Terminator movie.
Though like most of you also mention; why make use of a movie title which movie was a major bomb.
Its now more than two years later, who is still waiting for any kind of tie in to that movie?
Personally I think the title Terminator, or The Terminator is brand recognizable enough that it doesn't need to tie in to any of the specific terminator movies.
In the 90s Bethesda also released plenty of Terminator games that did not refer to Terminator 1 or 2 directly other than their background lore.
I don't know what to say to the developers. I don't wish failure in general to anyone (except Abrams, Orci, Kurtzman, and their pals. And Todd Howard and his goons at Bethesda).
Perhaps it will work out for you and you get your investment out it and some profit as well.
I am not saying what you should have done, one must do what one thinks is wise. But I won't be supporting this game.
First of all this ^
But secondly .. why are you guys so interested into story/lore for an RTS? like.. THAT interested.
T2 is by far my fav movie (not only t series..but top 5 all movies), i agree that DF sucks goat butt and i ...don't care.
The gameplay looks amazing (not even that big of a RTS fan) and that works for me; i don't need a story or to play 'heroes' in a RTS.
Perhaps they had to put the dark fates name due to licence agreement or something like that but let's pray the content is nothing like that.