Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Classic pc elitists, get a job bro.
I wouldnt say it has no improvement, but very min to me. Snow is a reskin and it never add any physics in it or specific gameplay. Price wise, it is $10 less but it is also on the premium price on the 1st one asked. To me, the price for this is just same to other AAA game and I expect more.
He is entiled to his opinion none the less. I personally would agree that Miles Morales is better too.
Which means you don’t anything about the PC ports.
BTW I also have PS5 (PS4 before) and I have played both games on console before buying them on Steam. Which means I have played each one at least twice …. and I’m positive that Miles Morales is more like a big DLC than a real game. The first game is longer, has a better story and includes all DLCs on Steam.
Why should I? I'm commenting on the game not the pc port. Dumbass.
You should comment on Play Station forums, not here, Dumbass.
I'll comment wherever I want. And I don't use the playstation forums, so I'd rather comment on here.
In what way specifically? I have seen people say this in the reviews but no one ever really goes into what exactly is better about it compared to the first. With the exception of the graphics which I do agree are better.
I posted a review of the game if you are interested in my full opinion but I came to the opposite conclusion, still a good game but inferior to the first one. So what am I missing why is this one better?
How, it's literally the best part of the combat and only adds to it. Like the most inoffensive part of the whole game. Either you are trying to be different or you have a reason for not liking it which I'd be curious to hear.
The combat is better because of the new electricity and invisibility, the world is better because the snowy/christmas setting adds to the atmosphere, the web swinging has way better animations, the side content is better because you don't have to do those annoying "crime tokens" to complete areas again and they are just more simple.
The story and writing is worse here granted, however I think the pacing is significantly better and doesn't have any boring stealth missions. It just focuses on the main plot and nothing else, everyone loves to whine about how short it is but again, doesn't have any boring filler stealth missions. It may be shorter, but it uses it's time better.
My reasons probably don't represent everyone but that's why I think it's better, and probably why most people think it's better.
To be honest i am not that interested in your review. My view is Miles Morales is a bit better from a technical point of view. The fighting mechanics do seem to have advanced a small bit. Yes i agree it is a bit short but that does not in itself make a game bad. The actual content is what makes a game. I never pay full price for games and if anyone did then that is on them if they find it to be bad value..
Then you must also hate the electric web in the first game.
and capitalism
??????????