Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
My monitor is 165hz and I've tried turning off Vsync and restarting the game, but it doesn't seem to work. Gonna create a separate discussion for this issue.
The human eye is only capable of discerning around 25-30 fps anyway. Anything higher than 30 is "too fast for the eye to see." Everyone likes to make a big deal about running at 120 fps, but if you're at 60 then you already have more than you need.
In my opinion, 40-60 is plenty enough to smooth out the majority of any dips in performance that might cause a bit of stuttering. But trying to run it faster will run your processor and GPU HOTTER. It's not just about processing capacity, you also have to take into account the thermal effects of running high speeds like that. If it runs too fast and gets too hot, it will basically go into thermal overload and then NOTHING will work right until you cool the system down.
So in short, if you're at 60 then you shouldn't need any more than that. Just go with it.
I have monitor with 165hz refresh rate, so I can actually see more than 60fps. But even if I had a monitor with a 60hz refresh rate, it's still beneficial to have a higher framerate since it helps decrease input lag. However it does introduce more potential screen tearing, which I can admit some people don't like.
Also, if anyone has a PC that can't sustain 100% load for multiple hours, then it's either has terrible cooling, it's defective or it has been overclocked way too much to be stable. I have gaming PC with 32GB RAM, RTX 3060 and an Intel i7-4790K which I have built myself, so I'll think I'll be fine. I've been using the same motherboard since 2015 and it still hasn't failed me.
One more point, if the developers designed the game to let you change the desired framerate in the graphics settings beyond 60fps, it would be fair to expect it to work.
I see. I use an aftermarket cooler for my CPU and I have 4 fans for my PC case, so cooling is not an issue for me. I also route the cables so that my GPU and CPU can get as much fresh air as possible. I've also delidded cpu one time to replace the thermal paste between the IHS and the CPU with liquid metal (newer CPUS have the IHS soldered instead of using thermal paste which is much better). I decided to stick with aircooling though, since I don't feel like maintaining a watercooled system.
Since you have an older graphics card than I do, it might also be a good idea to apply new thermal paste on the GPU, so the graphics card's cooler can work more efficiently.
This was another player I screened at the start of the race
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3158029699
this is me doing a barrel roll, you can see the driver's hand popping out
But I missed the best frames, where the whole pilot is popping out.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3158029894
Well, ...did you custom paint your ferrari 296 GTB? Because only when you do this the glitch awakes.