Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Lots of rumors. Here's what I got:
https://screenrant.com/dragon-ball-gt-is-canon-official-timeline/
https://www.cbr.com/is-dragon-ball-gt-currently-canon/
Damnit, Toriyama. Dragon Ball GT was my childhood. Why didn't you just say it was canon so that the world would accept it. However, in all honesty, "side-story" is as canon as it gets.
Daima is supposed to somewhat act as a fusion of the 2 isnt it not?
Super is just flat out undisputed canon and Daima probably will be too, GT was a weird experimental thing Toei did on their own back in the day when they wanted more Dragon Ball than there was to adapt.
No GT is not canon.
Super is canon since its the sequel to Z.
Daima plays between Z and Super but dunno if its canon