Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Like, you had SSJG Goku being capable of destroying the multiverse in the macrocosm of U7, and then you had him and Moro in ultra instinct only shaking earth.
Then, you had Goku who knows PLENTY about meditation, but when Vegeta does it, he just completely forgets and says that he has to move his body, only for the sake of a scene. Aswell as Piccolo "forgetting" that he could just go big, like, how exactly do you forget such a technique bro?
And then the animation, at times it went really well, like Goku Black arc and the Tournament of Power, the animation was insane, those were the best arcs for writing and animation, and scaling was slightly consistent, but aside from that, everything else was pretty garbage. I love DBS as much as the next guy but I'd give a 6/10 in general.
Yes and most of us Grew up with DBZ.. whatchapoint?
Its a cartoon not a way of life ..
Entertainment ..
DBZ is a space opera satire loosely based off the monkey king fable..
I mean do people take the movie Idiocracy as serious? lol
most people consider super to be decent gt is considered to be the worst by the majority of the fanbase
exactly .. most people know the artist didn't "make" GT it was ushered to continue DBZ for $..
Buu saga was it, there was no GT just like there was no shipoo-den.. Naruto and Sauske collapse under the bridge in Naruto
*Fin
Plenty of artists forced to either kill off their characters or chained to create more licence deals.
What exactly does another's personal state of mind or function have to do with the post topic though?
The point of the topic is discussion not gate-keeping.
Making people feel less to prove a point isn't fun or favored, its just silencing the opposition when the debater does not have a point left to make.
Insults are last arsenal in a debate, usually reserved for when and where some one will lose the rebuttal.
It's why people reserve often to refute a point with defamation, where most cases like a symposium its rare and more in jest.
Defamation can lower ones credibility on the subject even when the subject matter is solid.
Its almost the same as a complaint when a book was too long..
Do people no longer love massive rosters, and lots of content?
I mean the OP clearly doesn't like a fleshed out story and that may just be the issue.
I thought DBZ Super was more geared to fleshing out the lore, instead of
Next time on Fight!
tune in till next time till FIGHT. Like every DBZ before it
Not everything needs to be Sentai levels of Gi Joe plot
Super Is the medium of more story and less fighting.
most the fanbase were there for the fighting..
According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
Minimum Age for Watching Dragon Ball
The minimum age for watching Dragon Ball can depend on various factors, including the child’s personality, maturity, and the version of the show they are watching. The original Dragon Ball series is generally considered to be more suitable for younger audiences than Dragon Ball Z, which contains more violence and mature themes.
Dragon Ball and Early Childhood (Age 4-7)
At this age, children are developing their understanding of the world around them, and their ability to distinguish reality from fiction is still developing. Therefore, it is generally recommended that young children watch the censored version of Dragon Ball, if available. The censored version removes some of the more violent and mature content, making it more appropriate for young viewers.
Dragon Ball Z and Middle Childhood (Age 8-11)
At this age, children are better able to understand and process more complex themes and ideas. Dragon Ball Z, with its intense action and higher level of violence, can be appropriate for this age group, depending on the child’s maturity level. It is important for parents to preview the show and use their discretion when deciding whether or not to allow their children to watch it.
Later Dragon Ball Z and Pre-Adolescence (Age 12-13)
As children enter pre-adolescence, they may be more interested in mature themes and complex narratives. The later arcs of Dragon Ball Z, such as the Cell and Buu sagas, contain more intense violence and darker themes. Parents should use their discretion when allowing their children to watch these arcs, taking into account the child’s maturity level and ability to process and understand the content.
Dragon Ball Super and Adolescence (Age 14 and Up)
Dragon Ball Super, a sequel to Dragon Ball Z, is generally considered to be appropriate for adolescents and older viewers. The series contains more complex themes and mature content than the original Dragon Ball or Dragon Ball Z, and is better suited for older viewers who can understand and process these themes.
Dragon Ball in Japan
In Japan, Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z were both rated “A” by the Japan Video Software Association, which indicates that they are suitable for all ages. However, the Japanese ratings system is different from the one used in the United States, and what is considered appropriate for all ages in Japan may not be considered appropriate for all ages in other countries.
Sounds like DBZ Super was more "Story focused".
Not everyone grew up with neglect bad friends and abuse on the daily.
Most people I know don't vent their traumas at me.
Granted I'd not be the type to vent my traumas at them.
So different worlds I guess.